Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, they’re not “friends.” Truth hurts!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
I’m sure many do, but it can be challenging depending on how your “friend” explains their departure and the complaints their parents have expressed about their “friends” not being good enough to play with them.
Absolutely. If you’ve been on a team or playing with the same group of girls for years and you opt to switch before 7th grade to play with a better team far away you have shown us what you value, and it’s not your old friends.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, they’re not “friends.” Truth hurts!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
I’m sure many do, but it can be challenging depending on how your “friend” explains their departure and the complaints their parents have expressed about their “friends” not being good enough to play with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Where did solid pickups come from?
To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA
This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?
No one saying Coppermine isn’t a good team but yes, there’s a gap, which is why HG is ranked 7 and Coppermine 10, look at the common teams and scores. They aren’t in same tier as HG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
I’m sure many do, but it can be challenging depending on how your “friend” explains their departure and the complaints their parents have expressed about their “friends” not being good enough to play with them.
Anonymous wrote:Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Where did solid pickups come from?
To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA
This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?
No one saying Coppermine isn’t a good team but yes, there’s a gap, which is why HG is ranked 7 and Coppermine 10, look at the common teams and scores. They aren’t in same tier as HG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Where did solid pickups come from?
To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA
This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Where did solid pickups come from?
To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA
This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?
Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.
I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.
Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.
Where did solid pickups come from?
To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA