Anonymous wrote:
The teacher who was shot said others in the public school industry must also be held accountable for their gross negligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Don’t worry- she hasn’t been booked yet. Her lawyer made special arrangements to go with her to the station to be charged. Once they’ve formally charged her, I’m guessing there will be a mug shot.
I'm amazed that her name was not leaked weeks ago.
Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would love to know the logic for charging the Mom and not the Dad. Reports have said both parents took turns taking the kid to school. The gun was in the family house. How did they determine that the Mom was more at fault then the Dad?
One of the articles said that the grand jury is not finished. There could be more.
But, I think I read that the gun was registered to the mom--so that could be why. Gun was her responsibility.
That explains the gun charge but not the felony child neglect. But the Grand Jury is still deliberating so maybe something will come on that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would love to know the logic for charging the Mom and not the Dad. Reports have said both parents took turns taking the kid to school. The gun was in the family house. How did they determine that the Mom was more at fault then the Dad?
One of the articles said that the grand jury is not finished. There could be more.
But, I think I read that the gun was registered to the mom--so that could be why. Gun was her responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:I would love to know the logic for charging the Mom and not the Dad. Reports have said both parents took turns taking the kid to school. The gun was in the family house. How did they determine that the Mom was more at fault then the Dad?
Anonymous wrote:I would love to know the logic for charging the Mom and not the Dad. Reports have said both parents took turns taking the kid to school. The gun was in the family house. How did they determine that the Mom was more at fault then the Dad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what’s disturbing? That she let her 6 year old have access to a gun and her son used that gun to threaten kids and then shoot his teacher. Thats disturbing.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Apples and oranges comparison.
Anonymous wrote:You know what’s disturbing? That she let her 6 year old have access to a gun and her son used that gun to threaten kids and then shoot his teacher. Thats disturbing.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Anonymous wrote:The mom and the teacher could’ve been classmates, they’re the same age
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Don’t worry- she hasn’t been booked yet. Her lawyer made special arrangements to go with her to the station to be charged. Once they’ve formally charged her, I’m guessing there will be a mug shot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mother has been charged https://www.wtkr.com/news/mother-of-6-year-old-boy-who-shot-teacher-at-richneck-elem-facing-charges-including-child-neglect
Good!
I hope they don’t hide her identity and paster her face all over.
Her name is listed in multiple articles.
Right but no pictures… at least not yet.
Why do you need pictures? Do you live in Newport News and think you might run in to her at the supermarket or something?
Why do you care?
Because you posting in disappointment that there are not pictures of this woman is disturbing. Why do you need her photograph?
-DP
Why does someone who's so criminally negligent deserve privacy for what they look like?
-DP