Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there was any doubt the speaker was all about political purposes, Youngkin brought up “book challenges” at the debate and is already using this episode in an ad.
Shocker
If the “concerned mom” is an actress does she get residuals if she’s used in political ads?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Criminal Code - just sayin
18.2-374.1
" 'Child pornography' means SEXUALLY EXPLICIT VISUAL MATERIAL which utilizes or has as a subject an identifiable minor."
18.2-374.1:1
"C. Any person who knowingly . . . DISTRIBUTES . . . PURCHASES, or possesses with intent to . . . distribute, transmit, or display child pornography . . . shall be punished by not less than five years nor more than 20 years in a state correctional facility."
"F. For purposes of this section it may be inferred by text, title or appearance that a person who is depicted as or presents the appearance of being less than 18 years of age in sexually explicit visual material is less than 18 years of age."
Right.
So,
None of this is even remotely applicable to either book in question.
Yeah, but he put DISTRIBUTES and PURCHASES in caps and did a “just sayin”. So he must know something.
I love it when non-lawyers play attorney.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS already cut public participation from 3 minutes to two minutes.
Some school boards make it even shorter.
Looks like there's a trend. Some school boards REALLY don't want parents inconveniencing elected officials with their opinions.
Exactly. And Terry McAuliffe agrees with them, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”
Anonymous wrote:If there was any doubt the speaker was all about political purposes, Youngkin brought up “book challenges” at the debate and is already using this episode in an ad.
Anonymous wrote:attended Pekarsky and Keys Gamarra’s town hall last night. They took questions. There were only 24 people on the Zoom session. Including them and there assistants. 20 people got an hour of attention. They also had office hours pre-COVID. My rep still does them virtually. She also responds to email. They will engage. I mean, maybe not if you are abusive. But in general, you just need to be willing to show up.
Not well advertised. I live in Pekarsky's district and have sent her emails on a couple of occasions. I knew nothing about it.
attended Pekarsky and Keys Gamarra’s town hall last night. They took questions. There were only 24 people on the Zoom session. Including them and there assistants. 20 people got an hour of attention. They also had office hours pre-COVID. My rep still does them virtually. She also responds to email. They will engage. I mean, maybe not if you are abusive. But in general, you just need to be willing to show up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS already cut public participation from 3 minutes to two minutes.
Some school boards make it even shorter.
Looks like there's a trend. Some school boards REALLY don't want parents inconveniencing elected officials with their opinions.
Or maybe they just want to get business done. You can talk to your elected officials when you want.
I attended Pekarsky and Keys Gamarra’s town hall last night. They took questions. There were only 24 people on the Zoom session. Including them and there assistants. 20 people got an hour of attention. They also had office hours pre-COVID. My rep still does them virtually. She also responds to email. They will engage. I mean, maybe not if you are abusive. But in general, you just need to be willing to show up.
Anonymous wrote:FCPS already cut public participation from 3 minutes to two minutes.
Some school boards make it even shorter.
Looks like there's a trend. Some school boards REALLY don't want parents inconveniencing elected officials with their opinions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Criminal Code - just sayin
18.2-374.1
" 'Child pornography' means SEXUALLY EXPLICIT VISUAL MATERIAL which utilizes or has as a subject an identifiable minor."
18.2-374.1:1
"C. Any person who knowingly . . . DISTRIBUTES . . . PURCHASES, or possesses with intent to . . . distribute, transmit, or display child pornography . . . shall be punished by not less than five years nor more than 20 years in a state correctional facility."
"F. For purposes of this section it may be inferred by text, title or appearance that a person who is depicted as or presents the appearance of being less than 18 years of age in sexually explicit visual material is less than 18 years of age."
Right.
So,
None of this is even remotely applicable to either book in question.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Criminal Code - just sayin
18.2-374.1
" 'Child pornography' means SEXUALLY EXPLICIT VISUAL MATERIAL which utilizes or has as a subject an identifiable minor."
18.2-374.1:1
"C. Any person who knowingly . . . DISTRIBUTES . . . PURCHASES, or possesses with intent to . . . distribute, transmit, or display child pornography . . . shall be punished by not less than five years nor more than 20 years in a state correctional facility."
"F. For purposes of this section it may be inferred by text, title or appearance that a person who is depicted as or presents the appearance of being less than 18 years of age in sexually explicit visual material is less than 18 years of age."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS already cut public participation from 3 minutes to two minutes.
Some school boards make it even shorter.
Looks like there's a trend. Some school boards REALLY don't want parents inconveniencing elected officials with their opinions.
Exactly. And Terry McAuliffe agrees with them, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”
Anonymous wrote:FCPS already cut public participation from 3 minutes to two minutes.
Some school boards make it even shorter.
Looks like there's a trend. Some school boards REALLY don't want parents inconveniencing elected officials with their opinions.