Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Happy to see the 2028 forum alive, though it could just be the Cap hater vs the Cap lover. In any event, welcome back. If anyone knows a good place to find a comprehensive list of recruiting showcase events and prospect camps I would appreciate sharing of that info. All weekend I heard parents talking about all the things their daughter is doing over the next several months while I stood by looking like the awkward monkey puppet meme guy.
Sorry, you are on your own brosef. Not even your friends are going to be helpful here. It’s every man for himself. Godspeed.
Anonymous wrote:Happy to see the 2028 forum alive, though it could just be the Cap hater vs the Cap lover. In any event, welcome back. If anyone knows a good place to find a comprehensive list of recruiting showcase events and prospect camps I would appreciate sharing of that info. All weekend I heard parents talking about all the things their daughter is doing over the next several months while I stood by looking like the awkward monkey puppet meme guy.
Anonymous wrote:How did Cap Orange look this weekend?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this negitive Capital talk because they lost one game to Coppermine ? Capital has good talent and recruting will show that. On the flip side , Coppermine has good talent as well. Recruiting will also show that.
This suggests there's an equivalency, which there is not. Capital has way (way, way) more depth than what Coppermine is currently working with. I watched this game, and Capital just looked flat. Struggled in the clear and low energy on offense. It was a bad game. It happens.
No need to over-interpret the last game out of 6 for the first tournament weekend. Coppermine came out firing, won draws, and went up 4-0. Capital did look flat and had some unfortunate turnovers. Coppermine's goalies played very well, stopping at least 10 shots. Capital ground their way back into the game, held Coppermine scoreless for about 25 minutes, and tied it up, but gave two goals in the waning minutes. Not a great game.
Lots of positives to take away from Saturday--tying #1 Hero's with grit and determination after starting 0-2, and playing a strong team game in every phase against Philly Blast for a multi-goal win, for example--along with some bright spots against Crush and Jesters on Sunday.
Not surprised that the Capital haters want to pick out the one lowlight and harp on it, but this was a positive weekend for Cap. Worth noting that every single game, save Coppermine, was positive for their ranking. Sorry to disappoint you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this negitive Capital talk because they lost one game to Coppermine ? Capital has good talent and recruting will show that. On the flip side , Coppermine has good talent as well. Recruiting will also show that.
This suggests there's an equivalency, which there is not. Capital has way (way, way) more depth than what Coppermine is currently working with. I watched this game, and Capital just looked flat. Struggled in the clear and low energy on offense. It was a bad game. It happens.
Anonymous wrote:All this negitive Capital talk because they lost one game to Coppermine ? Capital has good talent and recruting will show that. On the flip side , Coppermine has good talent as well. Recruiting will also show that.
Anonymous wrote:At Coppermine, Capital 28 Blue did rally and tie SW 28 Blue and tied Heros 28 Green, both games show 6-6 score. Yet, some say they appear to have less talent. Interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you parents are so competitive you just cannot accept that this is about recruiting not winning every time. The only reason to be on a club team at this level is for recruiting and equal playing time is standard. Who would spend $$$ for their daughter to be on a team and not be able to showcase her skills?
Have you not been a part of lacrosse before HS? At least 50% of parents spend the $$$ without being able to showcase skills.