Anonymous wrote:Can’t tell if this normal blowhard boosters or YT coaching staff this year trying to keep hype going but kudos to you all. Hard living in the Jenny t shadows

You make no sense. No one is hyping YT. OP mentioned the score of a game between the defending 4A State champs vs the defending 6A state champs. Only you would say that the mere mention of a score or that it was a great win was hyping one of the teams. What’s your team? My guess is it’s the most over-hyped team on this board.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Madison coach and 9 assistants looked like they weren’t prepared for a zone and eventually figured it out in 2nd half.

It’s not too hard to scout with all of the games being streamed now. I am not sure how you wouldn’t have practiced for a zone

They were all busy figuring out their non-substitution plan, from how it looked. They play their starters the entire game other than a couple of brief subs.

That’s pretty standard across most of the programs. Not enough depth and too big of a skill gap between top 12 and bottom 10

That is the problem with all the schools, there isn’t depth past the top 7-8 players on the team. Madison does have an advantage of 12-13 strong players. It will be a good battle of them against Battlefield. Madison will have a step above as the coaching staff is great at adjusting and being able to have the talent to do what needs to be done.

Can’t tell if this normal blowhard boosters or YT coaching staff this year trying to keep hype going but kudos to you all. Hard living in the Jenny t shadows

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:YT win vs Western Albemarle
11-5

Yawn. YT is irrelevant this year

Despite whether you think YT is relevant, a convincing win over WA is rare. Great win for an Irrelevant team.

Anonymous wrote:YT win vs Western Albemarle
11-5

Yawn. YT is irrelevant this year

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Madison coach and 9 assistants looked like they weren’t prepared for a zone and eventually figured it out in 2nd half.

It’s not too hard to scout with all of the games being streamed now. I am not sure how you wouldn’t have practiced for a zone

They were all busy figuring out their non-substitution plan, from how it looked. They play their starters the entire game other than a couple of brief subs.

That’s pretty standard across most of the programs. Not enough depth and too big of a skill gap between top 12 and bottom 10

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Madison coach and 9 assistants looked like they weren’t prepared for a zone and eventually figured it out in 2nd half.

It’s not too hard to scout with all of the games being streamed now. I am not sure how you wouldn’t have practiced for a zone

They were all busy figuring out their non-substitution plan, from how it looked. They play their starters the entire game other than a couple of brief subs.

Anonymous wrote:Madison coach and 9 assistants looked like they weren’t prepared for a zone and eventually figured it out in 2nd half.

It’s not too hard to scout with all of the games being streamed now. I am not sure how you wouldn’t have practiced for a zone

Madison coach and 9 assistants looked like they weren’t prepared for a zone and eventually figured it out in 2nd half.

YT win vs Western Albemarle
11-5

Anonymous wrote:Madison 13
Lightridge 10
9-9 going into 4th

LR goalie was excellent and their #5 middie is probably the best field player we’ve played against all year.

Madison 13
Lightridge 10
9-9 going into 4th

AC 16 Soco 15 in OT

Anonymous wrote:Patriot district updates

Woodson 9 Fairfax 3
LB 13 West Po 5
Robo vs WS???
Soco vs AC???

Robo 15 WS 7

Patriot district updates

Woodson 9 Fairfax 3
LB 13 West Po 5
Robo vs WS???
Soco vs AC???