Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bow looks classy.

If it was a Hilary Clinton headband--yes those looked juvenile but the bow looks classy.

+1
The bow on an older woman would look silly, but she's still young enough to pull it off and look beautiful. And I agree about the Hillary Clinton headband stage. Very juvenile.

at 40? She's young enough?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bow looks classy.

If it was a Hilary Clinton headband--yes those looked juvenile but the bow looks classy.

+1
The bow on an older woman would look silly, but she's still young enough to pull it off and look beautiful. And I agree about the Hillary Clinton headband stage. Very juvenile.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

And yet she did - and looked gorgeous.

The bow didn’t make her gorgeous. It was the low point in her look.

Haters gonna hate. She is absolutely gorgeous woman, even if she wears just a bow in her hair. Don't be jealous.

I’m confused by your point. Is your point that people on a fashion forum should not critique the fashion of a woman if she is beautiful? So we can only criticize the fashion choices of plain women? Or just not criticize anyone’s fashion choices? No one said the bow made her look ugly. The point was that it looked silly and juvenile and disrupted what was otherwise a nice fashion choice. Some people disagree and they are entitled to their opinions as well. I don’t think anyone is particularly jealous of her. I’d put a bullet through my head before sleeping with Don Jr but that’s neither here nor there for the fashion issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this grieving widow in her spangly, ill-fitting suit count as a Trump Woman?

I think she’s more of a Vance woman.

Anonymous wrote:The bow looks classy.

If it was a Hilary Clinton headband--yes those looked juvenile but the bow looks classy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

And yet she did - and looked gorgeous.

The bow didn’t make her gorgeous. It was the low point in her look.

Haters gonna hate. She is absolutely gorgeous woman, even if she wears just a bow in her hair. Don't be jealous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

And yet she did - and looked gorgeous.

The bow didn’t make her gorgeous. It was the low point in her look.

Haters gonna hate. She is absolutely gorgeous woman, even if she wears just a bow in her hair. Don't be jealous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

And yet she did - and looked gorgeous.

The bow didn’t make her gorgeous. It was the low point in her look.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

And it's not like you wouldn't see them in person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

And yet she did - and looked gorgeous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Anonymous wrote:I realize that this was covered already but this 39 yr old should not wear a bow in her hair.