Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Serious question -- I am as angry as everyone else but I don't understand why to opt out of testing. I mean, if my kid tests positive I DO want the kids to quarantine right? I'm not sure hiding actual real positive cases is the answer? The problem is them being overly cautious about symptoms not real cases.
What testing? None of my kids’ schools have communicated anything about opting in to testing.
The opt-in testing messages have come from central office.
Anonymous wrote:In the end I just feel so defeated and betrayed by all of this. I so stupidly trusted them all summer when they promised us over and over again it would be five days a week. I am not a regular complainer at school. We have been nothing but happy with MCPS except for this. It has exposed so much about how they operate on all levels. It just kind of takes my breath away to think of them dropping this on us just before a holiday weekend, with happy kids finishing their first full week of school, to try and bury it. I support strong covid protections but this is so beyond CDC or anyone else. Why not rapid testing?
It’s also just another symptom of how everyone in our country has to be extreme something. In the South it’s raging and kids don’t have to wear masks. Here the rates are still extremely low, even with the spike, and our kids are quarantining because of exposure to one person with one symptom while they were wearing masks.
I really, really thought BOE had wised up. Struck a practical and safe balance for school openings. I was just thinking well, this might be enough to not angrily vote against every BOE member I can find in the next election or three. This week all of my mom friends and I are texting each other about how we cannot wait to vote against every single one of them. Whether they made this decision or not, they still can control it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why everyone keeps saying MCPS is sending kids home. You do know that the DHHS health room nurse is the one who decides, right?
That is an interesting point. So are you saying the nurse works for the health department and not MCPS? Is that true?
Yes they (the nurse and health tech) are employees of the health department. I didn't realize that until my 2nd year teaching. I always assumed that they were mcps employees.
Who tells them who to quarantine? MCPS. They aren’t in the classroom right? So confusing.
Anonymous wrote:and how would they know who to quarantine? In the health room? Must be some communication?Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why everyone keeps saying MCPS is sending kids home. You do know that the DHHS health room nurse is the one who decides, right?
Anonymous wrote:Apparently the new “guidance” confirms what we’ve been hearing. If a child has “symptoms” associated with COVID (could be a runny nose) their close contacts (this has been interpreted as the entire class in many schools) are quarantined for ten days.
This is completely ludicrous and not based in science or CDC guidelines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened Friday at our school. Long story short: the kid got a rapid test with a negative result that evening, so nobody will be quarantined next week (the plan was for the kid’s entire class to be quarantined unless the kid tested negative).
The point of the policy is to force parents to quickly test their kids.
If schools could simply test immediately onsite, then we wouldn’t have these false alarms.
Yup. And they have the federal money to do just that. They just won't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened Friday at our school. Long story short: the kid got a rapid test with a negative result that evening, so nobody will be quarantined next week (the plan was for the kid’s entire class to be quarantined unless the kid tested negative).
The point of the policy is to force parents to quickly test their kids.
If schools could simply test immediately onsite, then we wouldn’t have these false alarms.
Yup. And they have the federal money to do just that. They just won't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Serious question -- I am as angry as everyone else but I don't understand why to opt out of testing. I mean, if my kid tests positive I DO want the kids to quarantine right? I'm not sure hiding actual real positive cases is the answer? The problem is them being overly cautious about symptoms not real cases.
What testing? None of my kids’ schools have communicated anything about opting in to testing.
Anonymous wrote:
Serious question -- I am as angry as everyone else but I don't understand why to opt out of testing. I mean, if my kid tests positive I DO want the kids to quarantine right? I'm not sure hiding actual real positive cases is the answer? The problem is them being overly cautious about symptoms not real cases.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened Friday at our school. Long story short: the kid got a rapid test with a negative result that evening, so nobody will be quarantined next week (the plan was for the kid’s entire class to be quarantined unless the kid tested negative).
The point of the policy is to force parents to quickly test their kids.
If schools could simply test immediately onsite, then we wouldn’t have these false alarms.
Yup. And they have the federal money to do just that. They just won't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why everyone keeps saying MCPS is sending kids home. You do know that the DHHS health room nurse is the one who decides, right?
That is an interesting point. So are you saying the nurse works for the health department and not MCPS? Is that true?
Yes they (the nurse and health tech) are employees of the health department. I didn't realize that until my 2nd year teaching. I always assumed that they were mcps employees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been a part of numerous discussions this weekend where parents discussed telling their kids not to go to the nurse or report things, across parents in multiple ES, so at least from my limited sample this seems to really be having a perverse effect.
Well, the good part about ES kids is they tell on their parents constantly. Everyone will know who is lying, sorry to the insane parents hoping this would work.
Anonymous wrote:This happened Friday at our school. Long story short: the kid got a rapid test with a negative result that evening, so nobody will be quarantined next week (the plan was for the kid’s entire class to be quarantined unless the kid tested negative).
The point of the policy is to force parents to quickly test their kids.
If schools could simply test immediately onsite, then we wouldn’t have these false alarms.