Anonymous wrote:

Whoops indeed. He can only donate $2800 twice - she hasn’t had her primary yet so one max out for the primary and another for the general. She’ll need to give that back. So funny, I was just thinking about Steyer on Saturday looking at the Louisiana election results - had totally forgotten about him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think MT is going to be more of a toss up, and Ernst is in trouble if people on the ground that I know in IA are to be believed.

Who do you know? Specifically, are your friends and family Republican? Or do you have political friends working in Iowa? I’m just curious who is saying what.

This is more inline with what I had been hearing

That’s not nearly a wide enough lead. I don’t like that at all.

That's an awful showing for an R incumbent in a reddish state. She won by 9 points in 2014. She's sweating bullets this time.

Greenfield outraised Ernst in 2nd quarter fundraising by $2.4M.

Some important Senate stuff getting decided today:

“In the Alabama Republican Senate primary runoff, a battle between scoring the president's backing and vigorously aligning with his agenda is coming to a head. For Maine Sen. Susan Collins, one of the most endangered Republicans in the Trump era, her toughest re-election yet is about to officially get a rival. And in Texas, two Democrats are tangling over the Senate nomination to take on the president's ally, Sen. John Cornyn, and help put the state in play for former Vice President Joe Biden at the top of the ticket.”

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/ballot-races-alabama-maine-texas-revolve-trump-things/story?id=71753770&__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:New Montana poll:

I am a huge fan of Bullock. He seems so in touch with his voters and just an overall good guy. Really wishing him the best of luck.

New Montana poll:

Anonymous wrote:Notice who’s not on the list — Gardner and McSally. Because they’re already toast.

Collins and Tillis should be the next targets, for sure. Those seats are winnable. Ernst and Graham, I’m just not so sure. I hate throwing money and resources at things that are just fools errands.

Notice who’s not on the list — Gardner and McSally. Because they’re already toast.

Anonymous wrote:Mitch is backing a "RINO" horse in the Kansas race. In other words, he is not horrible enough to back Klobach.

Oh yeah, the entire Senate GOP didn’t want him to run because he puts the seat in danger.

Mitch is backing a "RINO" horse in the Kansas race. In other words, he is not horrible enough to back Klobach.

Wow, friends in really strange places.

Look out for Alaska...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think MT is going to be more of a toss up, and Ernst is in trouble if people on the ground that I know in IA are to be believed.

Who do you know? Specifically, are your friends and family Republican? Or do you have political friends working in Iowa? I’m just curious who is saying what.

This is more inline with what I had been hearing

That’s not nearly a wide enough lead. I don’t like that at all.

That's an awful showing for an R incumbent in a reddish state. She won by 9 points in 2014. She's sweating bullets this time.

It’s a terrible showing, but that’s still too much of a squeaker for me and she could still win, if only by a hair.

Yes, she might. But they only thing that matters is taking back the Senate and there are enough other opportunities with better leads for Dems to do it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think MT is going to be more of a toss up, and Ernst is in trouble if people on the ground that I know in IA are to be believed.

Who do you know? Specifically, are your friends and family Republican? Or do you have political friends working in Iowa? I’m just curious who is saying what.

This is more inline with what I had been hearing

That’s not nearly a wide enough lead. I don’t like that at all.

That's an awful showing for an R incumbent in a reddish state. She won by 9 points in 2014. She's sweating bullets this time.

It’s a terrible showing, but that’s still too much of a squeaker for me and she could still win, if only by a hair.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think MT is going to be more of a toss up, and Ernst is in trouble if people on the ground that I know in IA are to be believed.

Who do you know? Specifically, are your friends and family Republican? Or do you have political friends working in Iowa? I’m just curious who is saying what.

This is more inline with what I had been hearing

That’s not nearly a wide enough lead. I don’t like that at all.

That's an awful showing for an R incumbent in a reddish state. She won by 9 points in 2014. She's sweating bullets this time.