Anonymous wrote:Yes, we have IEP (now in elementary), but we're not connected to DCI special ed team.
What kind of work do DCI kids need to do outside of a list of approved sites, which would make it difficult to get the work done? Sincere question. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:It would be good if they locked down the Chromebooks so they could see only approved websites or something. I don't know whether that is the case.
We're at a feeder and one of my kids is highly distractible and has exec functioning and writing issues. So I see the benefits of technology (typing rather than writing) and not having to keep track of so many pieces of paper (a major issue in elementary already). But he's also distractible so he needs to be kept on task.
How would this work for him at DCI?
Anonymous wrote:Blended classrooms also use teachers. Teachers work with small groups of students while others work on computer based learning. If DCI isn't using some blended learning, then what are they doing with the chromebooks? Given its 1:1 approach, DCI is probably relying more on computer use than most other schools even if it doesn't offer complete on line classes, such as Algebra. In fact, DCI talks about how kids can learn at their own pace and how computers allow teachers to differentiate learning.
Lots of research suggests tech has many disadvantages. Does that mean schools shouldn't us computers? No, I don't think so. Lots of great ways to use computers in the classrom. But schools need to be thoughtful about how they are using them, something DCI (and other school districts) isn't doing. At the open houses, DCI just talks about how great the tech is, how it saves kids from carrying heavy books and helps them stay organized.
I
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yesterday NPR did a nice story discussing summary of findings... very mixed findings. I think schools adopting a 1:1 program really need to review the research and adapt their programs. Lots of benefits for computer use but approach needs to be targeted. The tech is great mantra supported by DCI appears not to be backed by research.
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/08/11/488728266/caution-flags-for-tech-in-classrooms
Except so much of what is discussed in here isn't what DCI is doing - eg Algebra 1 taught online.
Anonymous wrote:Yesterday NPR did a nice story discussing summary of findings... very mixed findings. I think schools adopting a 1:1 program really need to review the research and adapt their programs. Lots of benefits for computer use but approach needs to be targeted. The tech is great mantra supported by DCI appears not to be backed by research.
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/08/11/488728266/caution-flags-for-tech-in-classrooms
Anonymous wrote:Yesterday NPR did a nice story discussing summary of findings... very mixed findings. I think schools adopting a 1:1 program really need to review the research and adapt their programs. Lots of benefits for computer use but approach needs to be targeted. The tech is great mantra supported by DCI appears not to be backed by research.
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/08/11/488728266/caution-flags-for-tech-in-classrooms
Anonymous wrote:20:02 I can't follow your reasoning at all. Not sure how you reached the conclusion that "our students need to do as much of their reading on devices as possible, so that they develop skills specific to digital contexts."
Would love to hear more about the comparison of DCI to BASIS and other middle schools.