Anonymous wrote:Don't indulge the TROLLS! Be wary of the sudden surge of high schoolers... Trolls seem to be having a field day in this area, so get ready and resist the urge to engage with any hostile, pessimistic, or peculiar posts. The lenient parents from these schools all seem to know each other and would never participate in such actions, ideas, or comments seriously. Dear high schooler please Focus on hitting the books and maintaining your grades instead of hanging around and trolling on this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not quite. SJC came out with three very easy quick goals, but overall it felt like a bit of an off day. After the first few goals, looked like Saints defense really settled in and made it tough for SJC to get anything clean-- shots felt rushed, off, and weaker than i've seen. On the SSSA side, honestly didn’t see a weak link on offense. They looked way more connected than I remember last year, moving the ball well and not playing hero ball. Not sure exactly who the underclassmen were, but they’ve definitely got depth.

This season, the spotlight is on the Saints underclassmen—talented young players who are stepping up after some members didn't meet expectations last year. With key personnel changes made during the offseason, they're now headed in the right direction, thanks to their new teammates taking the lead.

Is this for real? The new teammates are taking the lead? And finally they are headed in the right direction? There are only a handful of new teammates, and all but one returning player is committed. Let me guess…you’re a parent of a “new teammate”?

New mom isn’t very subtle is she!

Duh - She's been commenting here for the last 5 days about how great an addition her child is pretending to be different posters.

This is so pathetic. And everyone knows who she is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not quite. SJC came out with three very easy quick goals, but overall it felt like a bit of an off day. After the first few goals, looked like Saints defense really settled in and made it tough for SJC to get anything clean-- shots felt rushed, off, and weaker than i've seen. On the SSSA side, honestly didn’t see a weak link on offense. They looked way more connected than I remember last year, moving the ball well and not playing hero ball. Not sure exactly who the underclassmen were, but they’ve definitely got depth.

This season, the spotlight is on the Saints underclassmen—talented young players who are stepping up after some members didn't meet expectations last year. With key personnel changes made during the offseason, they're now headed in the right direction, thanks to their new teammates taking the lead.

Is this for real? The new teammates are taking the lead? And finally they are headed in the right direction? There are only a handful of new teammates, and all but one returning player is committed. Let me guess…you’re a parent of a “new teammate”?

New mom isn’t very subtle is she!

Duh - She's been commenting here for the last 5 days about how great an addition her child is pretending to be different posters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just stop using excuses “we don’t have all our players”. Injuries impact most schools. Key senior D1 commits/critical underclass girls are missing the season or playing at a reduced rate across ISL and WCAC: SSSAS, Stone Ridge, St John’s, Potomac, just to name a few.

FFS they won by 5. It was not really close at all in the 2nd half and yes, they were missing key players and had one ejected. Holton had 1 goal in the second half. And the parents on both sides were well behaved.

Haha you sound disturbed. It's ok to have a tough game as that is what happens in sports.

You’re the one making veiled threats that Visi girls will have to face your badass daughter and her friends on the field soon.

Anonymous wrote:They will

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just stop using excuses “we don’t have all our players”. Injuries impact most schools. Key senior D1 commits/critical underclass girls are missing the season or playing at a reduced rate across ISL and WCAC: SSSAS, Stone Ridge, St John’s, Potomac, just to name a few.

FFS they won by 5. It was not really close at all in the 2nd half and yes, they were missing key players and had one ejected. Holton had 1 goal in the second half. And the parents on both sides were well behaved.

Haha you sound disturbed. It's ok to have a tough game as that is what happens in sports.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just stop using excuses “we don’t have all our players”. Injuries impact most schools. Key senior D1 commits/critical underclass girls are missing the season or playing at a reduced rate across ISL and WCAC: SSSAS, Stone Ridge, St John’s, Potomac, just to name a few.

FFS they won by 5. It was not really close at all in the 2nd half and yes, they were missing key players and had one ejected. Holton had 1 goal in the second half. And the parents on both sides were well behaved.

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just stop using excuses “we don’t have all our players”. Injuries impact most schools. Key senior D1 commits/critical underclass girls are missing the season or playing at a reduced rate across ISL and WCAC: SSSAS, Stone Ridge, St John’s, Potomac, just to name a few.

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just stop using excuses “we don’t have all our players”. Injuries impact most schools. Key senior D1 commits/critical underclass girls are missing the season or playing at a reduced rate across ISL and WCAC: SSSAS, Stone Ridge, St John’s, Potomac, just to name a few.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi didn’t have all of their players but Holton put up a good fight with what they had.

Ouch. Classic Visi. I wasn't at the game as my daughter plays at another ISL school but great job Visi parent for offending Holton. I am sure you were classy on the sidelines too.

"Good fight with what they had"... Continue to make excuses for your program. Our girls will see you on the field soon.