Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?

I don't think it was forceful enough. He should have said I can do this, this and that, but I will not. At least not right now.

Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.

Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.

Nope. Never dance with the devil and his spawns.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.

Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?

I don't think it was forceful enough. He should have said I can do this, this and that, but I will not. At least not right now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.

Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.

Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.

Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd be fascinated to see how this court would rule under a radical progressive president who attempts to assassinate his opponents and openly take bribes. I am also tired of justices pretending they're historians and have any good thumb on the history of this country-follow plain text if you want to be originalists but don't conjure up convenient analyses of history

Neither of these actions is covered by this ruling. Those are not "official" duties. Those are crimes, regardless of who is doing them.

If a crime has no enforcement possibility then is it really a crime?

Crime absolutely has enforcement possibility.
Tell me exactly how assassinating Justices on SCOTUS is an official act.

Not sure about that one but the bribery for official acts seems unenforceable if the the official act part of the scheme is not admissable.

Bribery is illegal and not an official act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire DOJ prosecution is illegal because Jack Smith can't be appointed by the Attorney General. It was always egregious given the plain language of the Appointments Clause, but the idea that the DOJ can, by fiat, create a position rescinded by Congresss is absurd.

All you folks worried about "King" Trump should look in the mirror because the Dems are the ones taking unilateral action not authorized by the Constitution.

Trump is a clown but he's no tyrant. Whoever follows Trump may be.

Well now, according to the Supreme Court, Biden can't be prosecuted for official acts. And president following can't be prosecuted for official acts.

Not sure the GOP and donors thought this out too well.

They are counting on Biden AND ALL FUTURE DEMS being wimps and living by the "When they go low, we go high."
They are betting that we are all upright citizens who will play by the rules. And, looks like they may be right. Someone really smart needs to be at the helm at this moment in time. Someone with cojones.

Exactly. I said this earlier in the thread. They know the Democrats will "be the bigger person" and not test the ruling.

If true, be prepared for the next step. I hope you chickenshit Dems have enough balls to at the very least protect yourselves when the guns coming pointing in your direction.

What guns?

Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?

Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.