Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Did the “J6 committe” say he did? When?

“ Second, and more significantly, the death of Officer Sicknick became a building block for the House’s impeachment of former President Trump and of the allegations posited by the Democratic House impeachment managers that were publicly filed in their pretrial brief on February 2. By then, there was already substantial reason to question the fire-extinguisher allegation.
”
https://news.yahoo.com/times-corrects-record-officer-sicknick-204024018.html

That was a low moment for the Republican party. Not Grand at all.

Having a Republican president impeached for inciting an insurrection? Low.

The RWNJ's really really don't want to admit that Tucker is lying to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Look squirrel!

“ Even if Sicknick’s death was causally connected to the rioting, prosecutors would be obligated to correct the record if it did not happen the way they expressly represented that it happened. The House impeachment managers had not done that last week when NR published my column raising that issue, and to this day, although the impeachment trial is now over, we are still in the dark about the circumstances surrounding the officer’s tragic death at age 42.
”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Did the “J6 committe” say he did? When?

“ Second, and more significantly, the death of Officer Sicknick became a building block for the House’s impeachment of former President Trump and of the allegations posited by the Democratic House impeachment managers that were publicly filed in their pretrial brief on February 2. By then, there was already substantial reason to question the fire-extinguisher allegation.
”
https://news.yahoo.com/times-corrects-record-officer-sicknick-204024018.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Look squirrel!

Keep posting that crap. I’m sure you’ll find it hilarious when those Trumpers start hurting people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Thank you officer. God bless you”

Terrifying

😂

Anonymous wrote:

I’ve seen this before.
So what?
Did you think they were teleported out of the building?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Is your Google broken?

Seriously, you Fox types need to separate your heads from your posteriors. We all saw what happened in real time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?

Did the “J6 committe” say he did? When?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Four years in prison for going around the security screener

I don't have a dog in the fight. It just seems like the punishment seems a bit excessive.

Read what he pled to and look at the statutes and the recommended sentencing for them.

Anonymous wrote:

“Thank you officer. God bless you”

Terrifying

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Did Sicknick die that day or not?