Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:
A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.
https://trib.al/aWa5noi
NYT columnist David Brooks wrote an op-ed a few weeks ago titled, "The Epstein Story? Count Me Out,” lamenting people are too focused on the Epstein scandal + saying "the QAnon mentality has taken over."
Today he appeared in 4 photos from the Epstein dump.
Nobody is shocked that a GOP journalist doesn't want this released.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:
A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.
https://trib.al/aWa5noi
NYT columnist David Brooks wrote an op-ed a few weeks ago titled, "The Epstein Story? Count Me Out,” lamenting people are too focused on the Epstein scandal + saying "the QAnon mentality has taken over."
Today he appeared in 4 photos from the Epstein dump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:
A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.
https://trib.al/aWa5noi
NYT columnist David Brooks wrote an op-ed a few weeks ago titled, "The Epstein Story? Count Me Out,” lamenting people are too focused on the Epstein scandal + saying "the QAnon mentality has taken over."
Today he appeared in 4 photos from the Epstein dump.
Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:
A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.
https://trib.al/aWa5noi
Anonymous wrote:WHAT???
WHY IS THE MEDIA NOT ALL OVER THIS???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Today's NY Times article is just
Nothing to see here folks. Just Trump and Epstein inviting 14 year old models to Trumps house and plying them with alcohol. I’m certain nothing inappropriate happened and if it did. 14 year olds are basically adults anyway!
![]()
If I ever needed to warn another woman she needed to protect her child from my husband, I would have divorced him the minute I realized he was a pedophile. Maybe that's why Marla moved to CA to keep his tiny pedophilic hands and genitalia off Tiffany!
I can’t begin to make sense of what Marla Maples’s headspace must have been like if she knew enough to warn a mother like that!
I looked her up on Wiki out of curiosity… She and DJT married in December 1993. Tiffany was born a couple of months before that. So at the time of the (alleged) quote, they were still in the first year of marriage with a young baby. They didn’t separate till mid-1997.
Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:
A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.
https://trib.al/aWa5noi
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Today's NY Times article is just
Nothing to see here folks. Just Trump and Epstein inviting 14 year old models to Trumps house and plying them with alcohol. I’m certain nothing inappropriate happened and if it did. 14 year olds are basically adults anyway!
![]()
If I ever needed to warn another woman she needed to protect her child from my husband, I would have divorced him the minute I realized he was a pedophile. Maybe that's why Marla moved to CA to keep his tiny pedophilic hands and genitalia off Tiffany!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Today's NY Times article is just
Nothing to see here folks. Just Trump and Epstein inviting 14 year old models to Trumps house and plying them with alcohol. I’m certain nothing inappropriate happened and if it did. 14 year olds are basically adults anyway!
![]()
Anonymous wrote:How much more proof is needed? None if you are in touch with reality.
No amount will ever be sufficient if you are a Trump diehard.