That stack of paper is so thick. I’m in danger of dozing off.

Juliana this Juliana that. It’s the BLOOD

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prosecution closing is done.

Here comes the bumbling defense.

How did she do? Did she make most of the points we have discussed here and were in yesterday's texts about how implausible his whole story is?

I wish she'd emphasized that his whole tale about having an important work meeting on Feb 24 was a big fat lie.

I didn't hear her mention that - did I miss it?

Defense's closing is more focused on impugning Juliana than proving Brendan's innocence. Even without her testimony, there's still enough here that points to Brendan:

1. The blood evidence
2. The lie about having a meeting that day
3. The windows

Anonymous wrote:Prosecution closing is done.

Here comes the bumbling defense.

How did she do? Did she make most of the points we have discussed here and were in yesterday's texts about how implausible his whole story is?

This dude just loves to babble doesn't he

Anonymous wrote:he still speaking saying nothing

Well he did say Brendan got on the stand and “told a story.” Not the best choice of words for defense closing imo but very accurate.

Anonymous wrote:he still speaking saying nothing

at least he's not tripping over his words today. He's better at closing than questioning

*zoned

Anonymous wrote:he still speaking saying nothing

I know the jury is zoed out af.

he still speaking saying nothing

I miss my friend Joe

Anonymous wrote:One thing I can’t get out of my head is how BB brought up 3 or 4 times how his fingers went through the wounds…like he was getting off on it. Just disgusting

All while testimony and interviews from him and JMP state that Christine was speaking. Impossible if those wounds were from Joe.

One thing I can’t get out of my head is how BB brought up 3 or 4 times how his fingers went through the wounds…like he was getting off on it. Just disgusting

Another good closing by Prosecution - BB had to testify in to get Christine's "affairs and fetishes" into evidence, because there is no actual evidence of either.

Defense is going for confirmation bias as reasonable doubt. Essentially saying the evidence leads to agreed hook up, rather than catfish theory.