Anonymous wrote:Anybody have audio equipment (or know someone who does) that can go through this audio to hear what was said after the operator spoke and prior to Joe moaning? The expert said he clipped that part out and listened to it - he called it "clip gain"
There is more than one call on this audio, but the call he was talking about is the first one.
https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2013%2C%202026/CW%201%2002-24-23%2007.47.32%20(703)%20511-8466%20-%20Tow1%20(5497).wav
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the guy that posted here saying he brought cookies to BB on his birthday. I’d like to publicly apologize. I did not believe in you at the time.
Me too I didn’t believe him, but I’m not apologizing cause I still think it’s weird AF especially since he said he’s just an acquaintance. My theory is he’s the parent of one of the kids Brendan coached or something like that. I could see bringing my kids coach cookies, but not some random Dad who is an acquaintance in the neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey Denise. Can you see the truth now?
Who Denise??
Anonymous wrote:Did he work as a government contractor? or the IRS directly?
Anonymous wrote:They should bring in a SANE nurse leader who can refute BBs testimony that CB brought home case "files* - this is BS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the guy that posted here saying he brought cookies to BB on his birthday. I’d like to publicly apologize. I did not believe in you at the time.
Me too I didn’t believe him, but I’m not apologizing cause I still think it’s weird AF especially since he said he’s just an acquaintance. My theory is he’s the parent of one of the kids Brendan coached or something like that. I could see bringing my kids coach cookies, but not some random Dad who is an acquaintance in the neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Very interesting timeline! Thanks PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:T. Patrick Smith testimony:
On Feb 24, 2023, he was the acting supervisor, and Banfield was reporting to him. The supervisor was out of the country, and he was filling in during her absence.
To his knowledge, there was no meeting planned for Brendon that day. He himself was in Baltimore for another meeting.
Brendon said the meeting was with his "manager" but all other supervisors in that office were out of state.
Testified that Brendon's dress that day (in the video) was too casual for any sort of meeting.
WHAT!!??
nuts!!
a little inside baseball for yall. smith also testified that he was the tech agent. he went into the role a little. the tech agents role (among others) is to facilitate the recording of a uc meet. there are a variety of devices to do this. sometimes the uc has strong preferences about what device they want to use.
this takes a lot of coordination by the tech agents.
smith would have multiple reasons to know of the planned uc and meetings related to the uc.
closing friday morning and deliberations in the afternoon would be cool. verdict tomorrow?
I can definitely see a verdict tomorrow. Felony Friday. My favorite.
Anonymous wrote:They should bring in a SANE nurse leader who can refute BBs testimony that CB brought home case "files* - this is BS
Anonymous wrote:To the guy that posted here saying he brought cookies to BB on his birthday. I’d like to publicly apologize. I did not believe in you at the time.
Anonymous wrote:Hey Denise. Can you see the truth now?