Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

All fake generated by the media. Have you no shame?

Except your fake news put your guy in the white house. If you buy this "fake news" then how do you explain that Trump now says there is no Russian money when his sone said 9 years ago there was disproprotionate Russian money in the TO deals? How do you explain the deference to Putin and the excoriaton of NATO by Trump? There is a lot to suggest these claims have at least some merit.

Anonymous wrote:Ha Ha Ha, now the liberals are the war mongers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dossier is not the only source. There are multiple sources who say that Russia has kompromat on Trump.

How's the weather in Moscow comrade?. Real Americans don't use Russian terms like that. Only Russians and fake news outlets do. So you're either Russian or a CNN paid shill.

wait so now you alt righters don't like Russians?? confused.

Liberals are simple minded and often are...so I understand.

Most conservatives and those on the right don't trust the Russians any more than we trust the Iranians. However we realize the reality of the situation and don't react to talking points and hysteria.

I personally find it funny the DNC got hacked because it was there own poor practices and idiocy. Whats more, the Russians did the job our journalists here should have. But when it boils down to it, they didn't affect the election results. DHS said no voting machines were compromised and no votes were tampered with. There is no evidence the outcome would have been different had Hillary's staff not been stupid and gave their passwords to hackers. Trump would have won regardless.

Let's also add the following:
I'd rather make peace with the Russians and work with them for our interests than go to war. I guess liberals are warmongers - I'd personally would rather see a realtionship built so we can work together on several things to include the following:
get rid of ISIS
work on the space program. As it is, we were launching astronauts to ISS from Russian rockets since NASA's budget was cut.
http://www.space.com/34433-soyuz-rocket-launches-us-russian-space-crew.html

And we still are. ISS is a good thing and the Russians are in there with us, so lets do it together.

If you guys want to live in the past that's great..but as Obama told Romney in 2012...the 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

All fake generated by the media. Have you no shame?

Except your fake news put your guy in the white house. If you buy this "fake news" then how do you explain that Trump now says there is no Russian money when his sone said 9 years ago there was disproprotionate Russian money in the TO deals? How do you explain the deference to Putin and the excoriaton of NATO by Trump? There is a lot to suggest these claims have at least some merit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

DNC isn't a government entity. Plus, it has been reported they tried to hack the RNC...but the RNC believes in security obviously:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jan/11/donald-trump/trump-says-russians-were-unable-hack-republican-na/

http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-national-committee-security-foiled-russian-hackers-1481850043

SO there you have it. They got into the DNC because Podesta is an idiot who has worse cyber security practices then folks at the retirement home.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dossier is not the only source. There are multiple sources who say that Russia has kompromat on Trump.

How's the weather in Moscow comrade?. Real Americans don't use Russian terms like that. Only Russians and fake news outlets do. So you're either Russian or a CNN paid shill.

wait so now you alt righters don't like Russians?? confused.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dossier is not the only source. There are multiple sources who say that Russia has kompromat on Trump.

How's the weather in Moscow comrade?. Real Americans don't use Russian terms like that. Only Russians and fake news outlets do. So you're either Russian or a CNN paid shill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

All fake generated by the media. Have you no shame?

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dossier is not the only source. There are multiple sources who say that Russia has kompromat on Trump.

How's the weather in Moscow comrade?. Real Americans don't use Russian terms like that. Only Russians and fake news outlets do. So you're either Russian or a CNN paid shill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dossier is not the only source. There are multiple sources who say that Russia has kompromat on Trump.

How's the weather in Moscow comrade?. Real Americans don't use Russian terms like that. Only Russians and fake news outlets do. So you're either Russian or a CNN paid shill.

The intelligence officials who briefed Trump and Obama also had available unvetted “disinformation” about the Clinton Foundation, NBC News reported, but that was also not shared with Trump.