Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
You know "NOW" means in a year and a half, right?
Now as in make that the official recommendation for the board to vote.
Better a year and half than god knows when if Wootton is the holding school.
If MCPS doesn’t have the money to remediate Wootton as a holding school, how long will Magruder have to wait? If MCPS has or can find the money, then why close Wootton?
They aren't closing Wootton, they are moving it to a new location.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
You know "NOW" means in a year and a half, right?
Now as in make that the official recommendation for the board to vote.
Better a year and half than god knows when if Wootton is the holding school.
If MCPS doesn’t have the money to remediate Wootton as a holding school, how long will Magruder have to wait? If MCPS has or can find the money, then why close Wootton?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Truth is, Magruder could use Crown or Wootton as a holding school if they ever get funding. It just looks better to team up with a larger group and of course an opportunistic politician would take that and run with it.
No this is just wrong.
Using Wootton as a holding school means Magruder has to wait for Wootton to get on CIP and Magruder to get onto CIP. We have no idea how long this will take.
Using Crown as a holding school means we have a ready to go school now, not a hypothetical tomorrow. Moreover, if Crown is the holding school, there will be even more impetus to get Magruder to the CIP faster, as no one wants a brand new school under utilized. Not to mention Crown is way more accessible. From Magruder to Crown by actual transportation and traffic not just distance, Crown off of 270 is substantially better than going down Wootton Parkway, which is one lane for both directions.
Full disclosure: I am a Magruder parent with my oldest in middle school, soon to be high school. If the recommendation goes forward, and Wootton becomes the holding school, there is no chance my oldest will attend a functional school. My youngest, still in elementary school, likely also will attend a run down school that is an accident waiting to happen.
Move Magruder to Crown right now.
There is no money to fix magruder but Magruder given the issues should go first.
I’m the PP from above. Thank you.
I genuinely don’t get people who are just okay with the recommendation as if Magruder doesn’t exist.
The next round is for ES/MS consolidation. Surely this will help with funding. Find the money for Magruder. There always changes to CIP—see how Poolesville jumped the line. Stop just throwing your hands up and say o well that’s no money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
You know "NOW" means in a year and a half, right?
Now as in make that the official recommendation for the board to vote.
Better a year and half than god knows when if Wootton is the holding school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
You know "NOW" means in a year and a half, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
You know "NOW" means in a year and a half, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
If it is unsafe why are you ok with Magruder—a more diverse school with more FARMS students—going to Wootton?
Move Magruder to Crown NOW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m copying this from the Magruder thread and would love to hear thoughts:
Essentially, if money isn’t there for 27th school or for Wootton renovations to be turned into a holding school, why not let Magruder use Crown first and then decide what to do? It buys an extra 2-3 years and perhaps we will see an enrollment and funding difference, perhaps we won’t. But what is the harm in postponing for a few years to allow Magruder to finally get some priority?
That’s exactly the problem. Everything for Magruder is hypothetical, and we’ve been pushed back and ignored year after year.
If Crown was to be a holding school, Magruder will have a higher chance of seeing something happen, as MCPS wouldn’t want a brand new school just to sit there empty. Crown as a holding school is the fastest option for Magruder. Whereas with the current recommendation, who knows when Wootton will ever be ready as a holding school and who knows when Magruder will ever see renovations. Not to mention Crown is a much more accessible school location wise.
Let Magruder use Crown, then Wootton. Then revisit the boundary study 5 years or so from now. By then, enrollment may be in a completely different place as international students and federal jobs come back, and all the housing developments continue to boom in that area. You don’t have to operate a 27th school if you deem it to be unnecessary then. You can still move Wootton to Crown, in fact, Wootton would already be at Crown if Crown is a holding school. Just make a plan for Magruder
Magruder has been patient.
Magruder has been polite.
The time for all that is over.
Magruder can’t wait any longer.
Magruder is one of the highest FARMS schools in all of the county. Is this why the Board thinks it can ignore us time and time again?
Magruder should come first. Wootton families are saying the school is unsafe. So, is it unsafe or safe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Wootton is unsafe. Staff there don't want to remain at Wootton without major issues being fixed.
I can't believe parents would prioritize perceived prestige over keeping the environment where their kids are there for six hours, five days a week safe. You guys are basically prestige whores.
Is it safe or not? Parents are saying its unsafe, till they were offered to move to Crown and now want to stay. Why do they want their kids in an unsafe building?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Truth is, Magruder could use Crown or Wootton as a holding school if they ever get funding. It just looks better to team up with a larger group and of course an opportunistic politician would take that and run with it.
No this is just wrong.
Using Wootton as a holding school means Magruder has to wait for Wootton to get on CIP and Magruder to get onto CIP. We have no idea how long this will take.
Using Crown as a holding school means we have a ready to go school now, not a hypothetical tomorrow. Moreover, if Crown is the holding school, there will be even more impetus to get Magruder to the CIP faster, as no one wants a brand new school under utilized. Not to mention Crown is way more accessible. From Magruder to Crown by actual transportation and traffic not just distance, Crown off of 270 is substantially better than going down Wootton Parkway, which is one lane for both directions.
Full disclosure: I am a Magruder parent with my oldest in middle school, soon to be high school. If the recommendation goes forward, and Wootton becomes the holding school, there is no chance my oldest will attend a functional school. My youngest, still in elementary school, likely also will attend a run down school that is an accident waiting to happen.
Move Magruder to Crown right now.
There is no money to fix magruder but Magruder given the issues should go first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Truth is, Magruder could use Crown or Wootton as a holding school if they ever get funding. It just looks better to team up with a larger group and of course an opportunistic politician would take that and run with it.
No this is just wrong.
Using Wootton as a holding school means Magruder has to wait for Wootton to get on CIP and Magruder to get onto CIP. We have no idea how long this will take.
Using Crown as a holding school means we have a ready to go school now, not a hypothetical tomorrow. Moreover, if Crown is the holding school, there will be even more impetus to get Magruder to the CIP faster, as no one wants a brand new school under utilized. Not to mention Crown is way more accessible. From Magruder to Crown by actual transportation and traffic not just distance, Crown off of 270 is substantially better than going down Wootton Parkway, which is one lane for both directions.
Full disclosure: I am a Magruder parent with my oldest in middle school, soon to be high school. If the recommendation goes forward, and Wootton becomes the holding school, there is no chance my oldest will attend a functional school. My youngest, still in elementary school, likely also will attend a run down school that is an accident waiting to happen.
Move Magruder to Crown right now.
Anonymous wrote:Truth is, Magruder could use Crown or Wootton as a holding school if they ever get funding. It just looks better to team up with a larger group and of course an opportunistic politician would take that and run with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m copying this from the Magruder thread and would love to hear thoughts:
Essentially, if money isn’t there for 27th school or for Wootton renovations to be turned into a holding school, why not let Magruder use Crown first and then decide what to do? It buys an extra 2-3 years and perhaps we will see an enrollment and funding difference, perhaps we won’t. But what is the harm in postponing for a few years to allow Magruder to finally get some priority?
That’s exactly the problem. Everything for Magruder is hypothetical, and we’ve been pushed back and ignored year after year.
If Crown was to be a holding school, Magruder will have a higher chance of seeing something happen, as MCPS wouldn’t want a brand new school just to sit there empty. Crown as a holding school is the fastest option for Magruder. Whereas with the current recommendation, who knows when Wootton will ever be ready as a holding school and who knows when Magruder will ever see renovations. Not to mention Crown is a much more accessible school location wise.
Let Magruder use Crown, then Wootton. Then revisit the boundary study 5 years or so from now. By then, enrollment may be in a completely different place as international students and federal jobs come back, and all the housing developments continue to boom in that area. You don’t have to operate a 27th school if you deem it to be unnecessary then. You can still move Wootton to Crown, in fact, Wootton would already be at Crown if Crown is a holding school. Just make a plan for Magruder
Magruder has been patient.
Magruder has been polite.
The time for all that is over.
Magruder can’t wait any longer.
Magruder is one of the highest FARMS schools in all of the county. Is this why the Board thinks it can ignore us time and time again?
Magruder should come first. Wootton families are saying the school is unsafe. So, is it unsafe or safe?