Anonymous wrote:No question that Hegseth will eventually give orders that, if followed, will lead to uniformed military firing upon and killing civilian Americans; the only question is, when those orders are given, will they be followed?
If you do not own a gun get one and learn how to use it now. Yes now.
If you think Dictator Don will not change the gun laws in this country you are insane. Dictators do not let subjects keep their guns!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?
Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.
As a gun owner who wanted more restrictions, my daughter survived VT's shooting.
If you do not own one get one and learn how to use it.
Dictator Trump & sycophants are never going to hold an election in 2026.
God help this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the victim died trying to help people being brutalized by agents.
His response to them shoving two women was to a) help the women and b) put himself between them and the agents WITH HIS HANDS UP.
At no point does he reach for his gun.
What gun? According to people in this thread, he did not have one. Which is it?
No one's said he never had a gun. He had a gun that was bolstered that he never once touched or reached for. He was shot repeatedly in the back after the agents had taken this gun. His gun was never a threat to them.
And he had a legal permit to carry…you know the 2nd amendment the red all love?!?!! Fkg hypocrites
+1
Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the victim died trying to help people being brutalized by agents.
His response to them shoving two women was to a) help the women and b) put himself between them and the agents WITH HIS HANDS UP.
At no point does he reach for his gun.
What gun? According to people in this thread, he did not have one. Which is it?
They are all spineless.
No one's said he never had a gun. He had a gun that was bolstered that he never once touched or reached for. He was shot repeatedly in the back after the agents had taken this gun. His gun was never a threat to them.
And he had a legal permit to carry…you know the 2nd amendment the red all love?!?!! Fkg hypocrites
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the victim died trying to help people being brutalized by agents.
His response to them shoving two women was to a) help the women and b) put himself between them and the agents WITH HIS HANDS UP.
At no point does he reach for his gun.
What gun? According to people in this thread, he did not have one. Which is it?
No one's said he never had a gun. He had a gun that was bolstered that he never once touched or reached for. He was shot repeatedly in the back after the agents had taken this gun. His gun was never a threat to them.
And he had a legal permit to carry…you know the 2nd amendment the red all love?!?!! Fkg hypocrites
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.
Yay for you for rationalizing shooting a man in the back 6 times while six men held him down after beating him and pistol whipping him. And the gun he legally had on his person was in a holster so your theory makes no sense-he wasn’t wielding it. There is no simple explanation other than this was an execution and if you can’t see that shame on you