Anonymous wrote:Trump is losing it over these files! Must be really bad. He told a female reporter, “quiet piggy!” Goodness. WTF?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't Epstein's recruitment of victims from Mar a lago make Trump an accessory to the act of recruitment?
Whatever could or couldn’t be criminally prosecuted, the fact that he knew and the furthest extent of his rage was to tell Ghislaine to ‘knock it off’ is what the majority of moral Americans find repugnant. He should have reported them to police and the fact that he didn’t reveals his moral bankruptcy and the high likelihood that his complicity in that and other morally repugnant behavior prevented him wanting to come onto the radar of law enforcement.
Exactly. Anything criminal is past the statute of limitations anyway. The issue now is what Trumps behavior says about him, not whether he could be prosecuted for it. Looking at this through a narrow criminal law lens is the wrong way to do it.
Don't be so sure about a statute of limitations barring charges. Some states, inlcuding Florida, have none when the victim is a minor, when there is a cover up, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Why didn't we hear about the Katie Johnson rape case against Trump and Epstein in 2016?!?!?! She was THIRTEEN.
Why did the media bury this?
Anonymous wrote:Hakim Jeffries’ campaign was boosted by Epstein, wasn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
Isn't is possible that some/several/many Democrats have seen the original files? I need to know they have!
There are plenty of law enforcement and prosecutors who have seen the files. All it takes is one whistleblower.
The girl raped by Prince Andrew (after Epstein pimped her to the former prince), has killed herself.
Is that what you want here, PP ?
You are a serious sicko.
Anonymous wrote:Hakim Jeffries’ campaign was boosted by Epstein, wasn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
Isn't is possible that some/several/many Democrats have seen the original files? I need to know they have!
There are plenty of law enforcement and prosecutors who have seen the files. All it takes is one whistleblower.
Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
where is Wikileaks when you need them?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
Isn't is possible that some/several/many Democrats have seen the original files? I need to know they have!
There are plenty of law enforcement and prosecutors who have seen the files. All it takes is one whistleblower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
Isn't is possible that some/several/many Democrats have seen the original files? I need to know they have!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epstein’s own brother claims that the republicans are scrubbing Trump and the other republicans from the files. As someone pointed out, though, they are pretty bad at everything, why would this be any different?
Isn't is possible that some/several/many Democrats have seen the original files? I need to know they have!