Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Speaking of Epstein files…

Donald Trump once made a controversial remark saying, "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her," during an appearance on "The View" in 2006. This comment has been widely criticized and is often cited as an example of his unsettling remarks about his daughter.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-creepiest-most-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html

Said same on Howard Stern and it's even more gross. WaPo has a few stories about in and in one, Melania claims she was a virgin at 25 when she married Taco Dump so we can lay to rest that she was some sort of Pro.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2017/09/25/in-newly-surfaced-howard-stern-interview-trump-joked-about-giving-princess-di-an-hiv-test/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Bromance? No, this is a catfight.

President Donald Trump threatened “very serious consequences” against Elon Musk on Saturday if the tech billionaire and former adviser were to fund any Democratic candidates, the latest escalation in rhetoric as the messy breakup between the two former allies.
...
“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” Trump said in the phone interview, later repeating: “He’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.”

Trump threatens ‘very serious consequences’ if Musk backs Democrats
https://archive.is/DEZBC#selection-395.0-453.173

So. Much. Popcorn.

My word. How is this real life? The president of the United States is threatening consequences against someone if they…change their political affiliation..? Do we no longer have the right to change political parties? Imagine the backlash if Obama had said this.

All the intelligent people saw this coming.....maggots are still denying it and defending him.

Anonymous wrote:I just read Trump’s latest post. Only a couple of improperly capitalized words and it was coherent. This means they haven’t given him his phone back yet. Party poopers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Bromance? No, this is a catfight.

President Donald Trump threatened “very serious consequences” against Elon Musk on Saturday if the tech billionaire and former adviser were to fund any Democratic candidates, the latest escalation in rhetoric as the messy breakup between the two former allies.
...
“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” Trump said in the phone interview, later repeating: “He’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.”

Trump threatens ‘very serious consequences’ if Musk backs Democrats
https://archive.is/DEZBC#selection-395.0-453.173

So. Much. Popcorn.

My word. How is this real life? The president of the United States is threatening consequences against someone if they…change their political affiliation..? Do we no longer have the right to change political parties? Imagine the backlash if Obama had said this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her face, her voice, when showing the reporter her bedroom and childhood bed (at about 00:35):

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CsxHBS89Lw
[/youtube]

Oh wow. Never seen this before. That is incredibly disturbing.

Anonymous wrote:Her face, her voice, when showing the reporter her bedroom and childhood bed (at about 00:35):

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CsxHBS89Lw
[/youtube]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would having Musk back be a boon or albatross for the Dems? Does his problem with Trump now lead to a potential third party getting Musk’s backing?

Not if he wants us buying Teslas. Here's the deal. Put as much into it to get rid of trump and his cronies as you did to make us all suffer through this. And that means backing Democrats not some spoiler third party. Do that with your billions and we can consider buying Teslas.

More proof there is only party, the D+R party, and everyone else. So much a like that people just go back and forth between D and R. You stand for personal profit not for the people.

He doesn't have anyone to buy these cars right now. MAGA? This is who you want as your customer base for an expensive electric car? That is not happening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Speaking of Epstein files…

Donald Trump once made a controversial remark saying, "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her," during an appearance on "The View" in 2006. This comment has been widely criticized and is often cited as an example of his unsettling remarks about his daughter.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-creepiest-most-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html

Said same on Howard Stern and it's even more gross. WaPo has a few stories about in and in one, Melania claims she was a virgin at 25 when she married Taco Dump so we can lay to rest that she was some sort of Pro.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2017/09/25/in-newly-surfaced-howard-stern-interview-trump-joked-about-giving-princess-di-an-hiv-test/

Really??

Anonymous wrote:I just read Trump’s latest post. Only a couple of improperly capitalized words and it was coherent. This means they haven’t given him his phone back yet. Party poopers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would having Musk back be a boon or albatross for the Dems? Does his problem with Trump now lead to a potential third party getting Musk’s backing?

Not if he wants us buying Teslas. Here's the deal. Put as much into it to get rid of trump and his cronies as you did to make us all suffer through this. And that means backing Democrats not some spoiler third party. Do that with your billions and we can consider buying Teslas.

More proof there is only party, the D+R party, and everyone else. So much a like that people just go back and forth between D and R. You stand for personal profit not for the people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would having Musk back be a boon or albatross for the Dems? Does his problem with Trump now lead to a potential third party getting Musk’s backing?

Not if he wants us buying Teslas. Here's the deal. Put as much into it to get rid of trump and his cronies as you did to make us all suffer through this. And that means backing Democrats not some spoiler third party. Do that with your billions and we can consider buying Teslas.

More proof there is only party, the D+R party, and everyone else. So much a like that people just go back and forth between D and R. You stand for personal profit not for the people.