Anonymous wrote:So is the thought that the western Fairfax schools would send their kids to the western high school magnet and the eastern Fairfax schools would continue at TJ?

Since TJ is prohibitively far from some parts of the county I’m glad to see the equitable access to programming from 8130 come into play with the magnet proposal.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is insane. I've asked Jeff to lock it several times and he won't. I don't know what his deal is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am going to be so pissed if some political operative from a community totally unaffected by this new school finds a way to derail this purchase. I have the feeling this is already in the works - it's like we're back in 2021 with Rory Cooper pulling all the strings.

Yup.

Three board members didn’t vote for the purchase: At-Large Representative Ilryong Moon, Rachna Sizemore Heizer (Braddock District) and Melanie Meren (Hunter Mill). I live in Hunter Mill district and I am not going to vote for Moon and Meren next time.

And then there’s the Great Falls group, which seems to oppose anything that remotely threatens their school boundary.

Watch out!

You realize that this school doesn't affect Great Falls in any way, right? And no need to BS about some kind of domino effect, etc. Let me be very clear: the GF community is happy that there's a feasible western high school to help alleviate crowding in that area. It has nothing to do with us. If you keep trash talking this community, we'll report your idiotic posts.

DP. The Facebook and Next Door postings of the Citizens for Great Falls group and the BRAC member from Langley tell a different story. They are anything but happy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be good schools where kids could attend. No one will account to reject kids for no reason. If one school doesn’t meet your requirements then you can spend your allocated money to whatever system you prefer. School choice is great to keep the educational system competitive and desirable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is needed! We can’t really be free until we have the freedom to choose our education options just as anything else!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why you guys are going on about all of this?! Dems are always excited about new projects until they drop the ball. Wait till school choice becomes a thing in this area - I hope Trump will at least get that done before his time is up.

You do understand that school choice is a state issue and not a national issue? The Federal Government doesn't have a say on school choice.

Will be a Federal issue once this bill is signed into law - https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/833/text

Haha and schools will be free to reject you.

Again you think the school you "choose" is going to accept your child, you are living in a fantasy land. All you will do is take resources away from schools that are required to teach EVERYONE. And then your precious snowflake that couldn't even be accepted into AAP will get a worse education because the "better" schools get to be selective and the public schools have even less resources.

Yes! Thank you. All school choice does is divert resources and money away from public schools and into private schools who get to reject anyone they want, teach anything they want and use the money on anything they want. Everybody loses.

So, you prefer to keep low-income kids in failing schools. Just say so.
NP

The schools aren't failing as loud as you proclaim they are. Can't wait for your DC to not get into any private school because they aren't special. It's going to be fun when you have to settle for an actual failing education.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A magnet out here makes all the sense in the world.TJ is too remote for most folks

NO ABSOLUTELY NOT. We don't want our kids on the bus for 45 minutes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am going to be so pissed if some political operative from a community totally unaffected by this new school finds a way to derail this purchase. I have the feeling this is already in the works - it's like we're back in 2021 with Rory Cooper pulling all the strings.

Yup.

Three board members didn’t vote for the purchase: At-Large Representative Ilryong Moon, Rachna Sizemore Heizer (Braddock District) and Melanie Meren (Hunter Mill). I live in Hunter Mill district and I am not going to vote for Moon and Meren next time.

And then there’s the Great Falls group, which seems to oppose anything that remotely threatens their school boundary.

Watch out!

You realize that this school doesn't affect Great Falls in any way, right? And no need to BS about some kind of domino effect, etc. Let me be very clear: the GF community is happy that there's a feasible western high school to help alleviate crowding in that area. It has nothing to do with us. If you keep trash talking this community, we'll report your idiotic posts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be good schools where kids could attend. No one will account to reject kids for no reason. If one school doesn’t meet your requirements then you can spend your allocated money to whatever system you prefer. School choice is great to keep the educational system competitive and desirable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is needed! We can’t really be free until we have the freedom to choose our education options just as anything else!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why you guys are going on about all of this?! Dems are always excited about new projects until they drop the ball. Wait till school choice becomes a thing in this area - I hope Trump will at least get that done before his time is up.

You do understand that school choice is a state issue and not a national issue? The Federal Government doesn't have a say on school choice.

Will be a Federal issue once this bill is signed into law - https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/833/text

Haha and schools will be free to reject you.

Again you think the school you "choose" is going to accept your child, you are living in a fantasy land. All you will do is take resources away from schools that are required to teach EVERYONE. And then your precious snowflake that couldn't even be accepted into AAP will get a worse education because the "better" schools get to be selective and the public schools have even less resources.

Yes! Thank you. All school choice does is divert resources and money away from public schools and into private schools who get to reject anyone they want, teach anything they want and use the money on anything they want. Everybody loses.

So, you prefer to keep low-income kids in failing schools. Just say so.
NP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am going to be so pissed if some political operative from a community totally unaffected by this new school finds a way to derail this purchase. I have the feeling this is already in the works - it's like we're back in 2021 with Rory Cooper pulling all the strings.

Yup.

Three board members didn’t vote for the purchase: At-Large Representative Ilryong Moon, Rachna Sizemore Heizer (Braddock District) and Melanie Meren (Hunter Mill). I live in Hunter Mill district and I am not going to vote for Moon and Meren next time.

And then there’s the Great Falls group, which seems to oppose anything that remotely threatens their school boundary.

Watch out!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be good schools where kids could attend. No one will account to reject kids for no reason. If one school doesn’t meet your requirements then you can spend your allocated money to whatever system you prefer. School choice is great to keep the educational system competitive and desirable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is needed! We can’t really be free until we have the freedom to choose our education options just as anything else!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why you guys are going on about all of this?! Dems are always excited about new projects until they drop the ball. Wait till school choice becomes a thing in this area - I hope Trump will at least get that done before his time is up.

You do understand that school choice is a state issue and not a national issue? The Federal Government doesn't have a say on school choice.

Will be a Federal issue once this bill is signed into law - https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/833/text

Haha and schools will be free to reject you.

Again you think the school you "choose" is going to accept your child, you are living in a fantasy land. All you will do is take resources away from schools that are required to teach EVERYONE. And then your precious snowflake that couldn't even be accepted into AAP will get a worse education because the "better" schools get to be selective and the public schools have even less resources.

Yes! Thank you. All school choice does is divert resources and money away from public schools and into private schools who get to reject anyone they want, teach anything they want and use the money on anything they want. Everybody loses.

Not everybody loses. If the SB continues its poor treatment of UMC families, then we gain with school choice by sending our kids to an engaging environment without the threat of our kids being viewed as a resource to prop up poorer performing schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There would be good schools where kids could attend. No one will account to reject kids for no reason. If one school doesn’t meet your requirements then you can spend your allocated money to whatever system you prefer. School choice is great to keep the educational system competitive and desirable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is needed! We can’t really be free until we have the freedom to choose our education options just as anything else!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why you guys are going on about all of this?! Dems are always excited about new projects until they drop the ball. Wait till school choice becomes a thing in this area - I hope Trump will at least get that done before his time is up.

You do understand that school choice is a state issue and not a national issue? The Federal Government doesn't have a say on school choice.

Will be a Federal issue once this bill is signed into law - https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/833/text

Haha and schools will be free to reject you.

Again you think the school you "choose" is going to accept your child, you are living in a fantasy land. All you will do is take resources away from schools that are required to teach EVERYONE. And then your precious snowflake that couldn't even be accepted into AAP will get a worse education because the "better" schools get to be selective and the public schools have even less resources.

Yes! Thank you. All school choice does is divert resources and money away from public schools and into private schools who get to reject anyone they want, teach anything they want and use the money on anything they want. Everybody loses.

Anonymous wrote:I am going to be so pissed if some political operative from a community totally unaffected by this new school finds a way to derail this purchase. I have the feeling this is already in the works - it's like we're back in 2021 with Rory Cooper pulling all the strings.