Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
I’m sorry, but there is no way you can’t see the impact in the budget, operations, and everything else.
I just don't think this is the root of all the problems you describe.
DP. It's not. It is a symptom and a big symbol.
Yes, it's a symbol and just that. Can we move on now to the REAL things that impact students and teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
I’m sorry, but there is no way you can’t see the impact in the budget, operations, and everything else.
I just don't think this is the root of all the problems you describe.
DP. It's not. It is a symptom and a big symbol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
I’m sorry, but there is no way you can’t see the impact in the budget, operations, and everything else.
I just don't think this is the root of all the problems you describe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:46 pages later and I’m still not seeing how taking away holidays for Syphax staff is going to magically fund teacher salaries, recruitment and smaller class sizes.
Thank you. Can we move on now to teacher salaries and smaller class sizes?
Anonymous wrote:46 pages later and I’m still not seeing how taking away holidays for Syphax staff is going to magically fund teacher salaries, recruitment and smaller class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
A previous poster a said it best… it is a terrible look to suddenly grant certain employees THREE weeks of leave, especially as the vast majority of them already have high salaries and perks like teleworking.
The issues are not just with HR. They are throughout- finance, procurement, ridiculous initiatives that smack of being out of touch (have you read the proposed strategic plan?!). You can’t get a question answered because they’re always off taking the other three weeks they get… even the buildings aren’t maintained as well, though I don’t begrudge the custodians the leave. They deserve anything they get… but there’s a definite difference when you come in after Spring Break and Winter Break now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
I’m sorry, but there is no way you can’t see the impact in the budget, operations, and everything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
A previous poster a said it best… it is a terrible look to suddenly grant certain employees THREE weeks of leave, especially as the vast majority of them already have high salaries and perks like teleworking.
The issues are not just with HR. They are throughout- finance, procurement, ridiculous initiatives that smack of being out of touch (have you read the proposed strategic plan?!). You can’t get a question answered because they’re always off taking the other three weeks they get… even the buildings aren’t maintained as well, though I don’t begrudge the custodians the leave. They deserve anything they get… but there’s a definite difference when you come in after Spring Break and Winter Break now.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The vacation mafia is focused on the wrong issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please keep up. Show me what budget impact taking these weeks away from staff will do. How much more money to the bottom line will it add?
Answer: It will not add to the bottom line of more money to give teachers. It’s an intangible cost. And it keeps people who do the real work at Syphax.
It's not a couple of days, but weeks of vacation. That does have a huge cost. Stuff doesn't get done. Teacher vacancies don't get filled. Substitutes don't get hired. Teacher questions to HR don't get answered promptly. Test scores are delayed being sent to parents. Bus routes aren't fixed. School capacity calculations and redistricting proposals aren't thought out or verified. Trainings for teachers are half assed. Curriculum decisions aren't fully vetted. And on and on. Syphax had huge issues with quality and responsiveness before giving themselves a bunch more vacation.
Ok but these points are about efficiency and responsiveness of the employees. That's different from budget, which is what this post is about. Is there an actual cost in dollars or not?
Of course it matters to budget. With less vacation the work could get done with fewer people.
It also matters because poor Syphax work product is getting pushed out to schools and parents, which eats up teacher and administrative time and leads to requests for more school level staffing.
Ok, I will bite. What work is not getting done? And how do you know this is because of vacation time and not just due to incompetence/laziness?
“Just” HA!