Anonymous
01/06/2024 11:04
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
You better reach to Trumps crack legal team to let them know about your insightful argument because they forgot to include it in their appeal.
SCOTUS wil handle it.
Anonymous
01/06/2024 11:04
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
It’s not just an accusation. There was an entire five-day bench trial where evidence was presented from both sides and a determination was made by a judge that survived two appeals. You can find the docket here: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Case_Details.cfm?Case_ID=5240
This is not the same as a charge, a trial and a conviction in a court of law. He was deprived of due process as outlined in the Bill of Rights.
Due process, as defined in the Bill of Rights in the 5th amendment, contends that no individual may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without proper legal proceedings - a trial, the burden of proof required to convict someone, and limitations for carrying out such a process.
Colorado did not hold a jury trial to determine if Trump was an insurrectionist, nor did they provide the evidence to be used against him. Colorado did not adhere to stringent rules of evidence or procedures. They included hearsay in their evidence. And the burden of proof used against Trump was not beyond a reasonable doubt. Rules matter. Due process matters.
Anonymous
01/06/2024 10:58
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
[twitter]
You better reach to Trumps crack legal team to let them know about your insightful argument because they forgot to include it in their appeal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
You better reach to Trumps crack legal team to let them know about your insightful argument because they forgot to include it in their appeal.
Anonymous
01/06/2024 10:06
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
It’s not just an accusation. There was an entire five-day bench trial where evidence was presented from both sides and a determination was made by a judge that survived two appeals. You can find the docket here: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Case_Details.cfm?Case_ID=5240
MAGA not going to read. You'd need to convert that into a 280-character tweet that gaslights, lies, and/or insults.
Anonymous
01/06/2024 10:04
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
It’s not just an accusation. There was an entire five-day bench trial where evidence was presented from both sides and a determination was made by a judge that survived two appeals. You can find the docket here: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Case_Details.cfm?Case_ID=5240
Anonymous
01/06/2024 09:13
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
How can we know anything?
Anonymous
01/06/2024 09:08
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime?
An accusation is not proof.
Anonymous
01/06/2024 07:23
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
No, it says that in the sixth amendment, idiot. It's called due process.
Your argument is so dumb it’s not even one of the dumb arguments that Trump is making. Here’s the petition for cert:
https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/01/trump-14th-amendment-cert-petition.pdf
Did "Colorado Due Process" poster finally get the mic dropped on them? They went silent fast. So if SCOTUS inevitably finds away to get Trump back on the ballot but doesn't cite due process, is that a win or loss for this particular poster?
Anonymous
01/05/2024 23:01
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Blah blah blah.
Anonymous
01/05/2024 22:17
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
No, it says that in the sixth amendment, idiot. It's called due process.
Your argument is so dumb it’s not even one of the dumb arguments that Trump is making. Here’s the petition for cert:
https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/01/trump-14th-amendment-cert-petition.pdf
Anonymous
01/05/2024 22:15
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
No, it says that in the sixth amendment, idiot. It's called due process.
Anonymous
01/05/2024 22:12
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment?
Anonymous
01/05/2024 21:47
Subject: Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Missouri Secretary of State is working to kick Biden off the ballot!
Excellent! We can have this game state by state.
Then SCOTUS will step in and say "everyone sit down and shut up. We're not having anymore of this nonsense. NO ONE is getting kicked from the ballot....."
Or they enforce the constitution and kick off trump since he engaged in insurrection and Biden didn’t. But I don’t expect fidelity to the constitution from the republicans on this corrupt court.
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection.
You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you.
Anonymous
01/05/2024 21:47
Subject: Re:Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe posted already on this thread?
Gorsuch opinion when Colorado said a naturalized citizen (first name Abdul) could not be on the ballot, upholding the state's power to impose constitutional requirements on candidates.
That would be true in ANY state.
It is a specific requirement in the Constitution:
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
What Colorado has decided isn't. Especially since it is clear that "insurrection" has not been defined WRT Jan. 6. No court has heard evidence nor found anyone guilty of such. A single state (or even a few states) making that declaration doesn't make it so.
In federal court, six people have been convicted of seditious conspiracy, a crime related to insurrection and treason.
Those are true facts, unlike your fake facts.
Okay, so you've made some important points: (1) six people were actually charged as criminal defendants, (2) they were not charged with insurrection, and (3) they were given full due process of law.
Anonymous
01/05/2024 21:46
Subject: Re:Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe posted already on this thread?
Gorsuch opinion when Colorado said a naturalized citizen (first name Abdul) could not be on the ballot, upholding the state's power to impose constitutional requirements on candidates.
That would be true in ANY state.
It is a specific requirement in the Constitution:
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
What Colorado has decided isn't. Especially since it is clear that "insurrection" has not been defined WRT Jan. 6. No court has heard evidence nor found anyone guilty of such. A single state (or even a few states) making that declaration doesn't make it so.
In federal court, six people have been convicted of seditious conspiracy, a crime related to insurrection and treason.
Okay, so you've made some important points: (1) six people were actually charged as criminal defendants, (2) they were not charged with insurrection, and (3) they were given full due process of law.
Those are true facts, unlike your fake facts.