Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Four years in prison for going around the security screener

I don't have a dog in the fight. It just seems like the punishment seems a bit excessive.

+1

lol

Tucker is whipping up the violent extremists:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-social-media-threats-exploded-120107000.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Four years in prison for going around the security screener

I don't have a dog in the fight. It just seems like the punishment seems a bit excessive.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Four years in prison for going around the security screener

I don't have a dog in the fight. It just seems like the punishment seems a bit excessive.

It's already been shown multiple times, on this thread and elsewhere, what else he did besides going around the security screener (when the building was closed to the public anyway since Congress was in session and there was a pandemic).

Since you are trolling, I don't care much about your dog. Or your fighting skills. Or your brain.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Four years in prison for going around the security screener

I don't have a dog in the fight. It just seems like the punishment seems a bit excessive.

Anonymous wrote:

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

You're going to have to write in English. Using Google translate from the original Russian isn't working.

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

He left the question more open that the J6 committe does when they say that Sicknick was killed that day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Hey you seem to have forgotten mentioning what he did captured on videos Tucker refused to show. Like entering the building amidst a mob that had smashed its way in, breaking windows and kicking down doors. Even if he wasn’t the one smashing and kicking he was in the midst of the pack that did. Not a great choice.

Not only did Tucker refuse to show it, he actively lied about it. Tucker said, and I quote, "To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building." But in fact, there's no dispute because it's on video. Video that Tucker has but refused to show. Why is that? Why is Tucker lying? What is he hiding?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Tell us whether he and anyone else in the mob went through the security screenings to enter the Capitol building. Like every visitor is required to do.

Yes or no - it’s a simple answer!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

Hey you seem to have forgotten mentioning what he did captured on videos Tucker refused to show. Like entering the building amidst a mob that had smashed its way in, breaking windows and kicking down doors. Even if he wasn’t the one smashing and kicking he was in the midst of the pack that did. Not a great choice.

Anonymous wrote:It is disgusting the democrats concealed this evidence from the American people for over 2 year.

I am done with this party and will never vote for another democrat candidate again.

This is Chansley’s plea agreement. He signed off on the description of his actions:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/case-multi-defendant/file/1430996/download

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is disgusting the democrats concealed this evidence from the American people for over 2 year.

I am done with this party and will never vote for another democrat candidate again.

Hahahaha! You were never a Democrat. Please go back to your rural bombed out and depleted trash town (in rural America or Russia, not sure where these days).

Too funny. As if regular Tucker Carlson viewers were the Democratic party base.

Anonymous wrote:It is disgusting the democrats concealed this evidence from the American people for over 2 year.

I am done with this party and will never vote for another democrat candidate again.

Hahahaha! You were never a Democrat. Please go back to your rural bombed out and depleted trash town (in rural America or Russia, not sure where these days).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

None of this is remotely true.

It is absolutely true, but be a good little cult member and believe Tucker’s words above all else. Don’t believe your lying eyes!

It is disgusting the democrats concealed this evidence from the American people for over 2 year.

I am done with this party and will never vote for another democrat candidate again.