Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

It’s the same person over and over again. We’ve posted plenty of examples. They have a weird agenda and don’t care who they harm in the process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

Not all good or bad make the news. You need a new talking point and stop risking the safety of our kids.

The ones that are significant do and it's always bad news because SROs don't work and it's been shown they make schools less safe.

It actually has not. I've read the literature on this, and the results are pretty consistent.

The downsides of SROs are:

Students of color feel less safe, while white and Asian students feel safer.

There are more arrests in schools, and those arrests disproportionately fall on students of color

Note that neither of these things actually mean schools are less safe, but they are why SROs were phased out in MCPS in 2020. Now, the question is whether those downsides are significant enough to compensate for a decrease in safety in schools.

This is not true. Prince George's County, which is overwhelmingly majority black, just affirmed its stance on keeping SROs. You can't keep peddling this lie.

The fact that SOME black and Hispanic students say they dislike or feel uncomfortable having police in schools does not mean ALL or even the MAJORITY of black and Hispanic students feel that way!

DCPS has also found the same thing! They took SROs out and now the community is asking for them back, and DCPS, like PGCPS, is overwhelmingly black!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

Not all good or bad make the news. You need a new talking point and stop risking the safety of our kids.

The ones that are significant do and it's always bad news because SROs don't work and it's been shown they make schools less safe.

It actually has not. I've read the literature on this, and the results are pretty consistent.

The downsides of SROs are:

Students of color feel less safe, while white and Asian students feel safer.

There are more arrests in schools, and those arrests disproportionately fall on students of color

Note that neither of these things actually mean schools are less safe, but they are why SROs were phased out in MCPS in 2020. Now, the question is whether those downsides are significant enough to compensate for a decrease in safety in schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

There isn’t 1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

Google told me "search not found"

Stop making up lies.

Maybe you can post those results for us?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

Google told me "search not found"

Stop making up lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

Google told me "search not found"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

Any movement on bringing more CEOs to schools? Which Board of Ed candidates are running on having more CeOs in schools?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.