Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
Liar. It’s not “a fact”.
Twenty-four hours again you all were falsely accusing people. Some were obviously not the same people.
Two of those have already be legit identified. NOT D staffers.
Where is your apology?
Where’s the names and ID of the two? Post some proof.
Lauren Windsor and her co-worker (shown in video).
https://www.vice.com/en/article/3abzaj/lincoln-project-posed-as-charlottesville-white-supremacists-at-youngkin-gop-event
NOT Dem staffers.
From your own link:
The Lincoln Project acknowledged they were behind the stunt after VICE News identified one of the people dressed in the photo in front of Youngkin’s campaign bus as a low-level Democratic operative who has recently been working for Democratic sting operator Lauren Windsor’s The Undercurrent.
That operative who attended the Charlottesville rally, furthest to the right in the above photo, can be seen on-camera in their most recent sting.
Right. He’s not a D staffer. Certainly not the one you all thought he was yesterday walking with TM. They didn’t even look alike.
Where is your apology?
No one here owes you an apology, so run along. Maybe in the future YOU could stop jumping on bandwagons accusing Republicans of things they didn't do, a la Smollett, etc.
Really came up with one whole example and then tried to drop the etc. amazing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.
The news that releases on Wednesday, November 3rd at 8:00AM? Because it takes 72 hours to look at a photo, ask your neighbor 'Hey Chad - isn't that that douche that went to Georgetown and works for so-and-so who lives down the hall?', and then confirm the spelling of their name on linkedin?
Social media already positively identified (allegedly) 4 of the instigators.And if that's not enough all they had to do was charge the allegedly Lincoln/Democrat operative conspirator with defamation and get her to actually name the instigators in an emergency court order. That's if she actually has a list she can pull out from somewhere.
+1
If social media was relied on to positively identity the Jan. 6 rioters, then the same standard should apply here.
The Trump insurrectionists are idiots who posted themselves on social media. And wore identifying clothes, etc. Certainly no one was charged without evidence.
You - the irrational mob - are all quick to judge and sentence without evidence.
And you owe those people an apology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You realize that McAuliffe has already been governor, right? This “socialist dystopia” that I’m seeing referenced to here didn’t happen. Virginia under the democratic governors has been a pretty well run state with reasonable taxes. Some of the things people are complaining about - permits, school things - are local elections. I made some non-D choices in my local elections, but for the state and federal, no way would I vote for what passes as the Republican Party today.
Yep and he can't seem to point to any accomplishments or efforts to highlight which is why people aren't voting for him.He's a Clinton campaign hack and the last thing we need right now - straight liars.
Youngkin is a liar.
Did you vote for Princess?
So you say and no. It wasn't Youngkin's campaign that had party operatives standing out in the rain under opposition property trying to fabricate a falsehood. LIARS.
It was performance art to remind voters of the type of people who supports Youngkin, who is linked closely to Trump, the worst president in history.
Exactly. “Both sides”.
And it wasn’t campaign staffers. You guys still owe them apologies.
In one of the pics, the guy is seen on his phone. We would have to see his subpoenaed phone records to see what he was doing and where he was at that time, to ensure it isn't him. Otherwise, I will take the blocked/deleted twitter accounts to be evidence of guilt.
Exactly. I'm not having a hard time at ALL believing the posts which identify these losers. Occam's Razor, and all that.
Even the ones that have been debunked?
You are willing to believe LIES just because they suit you?
You also believe that there was extensive fraud in 2020?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
Liar. It’s not “a fact”.
Twenty-four hours again you all were falsely accusing people. Some were obviously not the same people.
Two of those have already be legit identified. NOT D staffers.
Where is your apology?
Where’s the names and ID of the two? Post some proof.
Lauren Windsor and her co-worker (shown in video).
https://www.vice.com/en/article/3abzaj/lincoln-project-posed-as-charlottesville-white-supremacists-at-youngkin-gop-event
NOT Dem staffers.
From your own link:
The Lincoln Project acknowledged they were behind the stunt after VICE News identified one of the people dressed in the photo in front of Youngkin’s campaign bus as a low-level Democratic operative who has recently been working for Democratic sting operator Lauren Windsor’s The Undercurrent.
That operative who attended the Charlottesville rally, furthest to the right in the above photo, can be seen on-camera in their most recent sting.
Right. He’s not a D staffer. Certainly not the one you all thought he was yesterday walking with TM. They didn’t even look alike.
Where is your apology?
No one here owes you an apology, so run along. Maybe in the future YOU could stop jumping on bandwagons accusing Republicans of things they didn't do, a la Smollett, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting poll release today from Tommy Schultz:
POLL
Q: "How much influence do you think parents of K-12 students should have over what schools teach?"
A: "Most or some":
Asian: 70%
Black: 67%
Hispanic: 67%
White: 75%
Suburban Women: 69%
A: "Not really":
Asian: 21%
Black: 22%
Hispanic: 27%
White: 19%
Suburban Women: 20%
Gee, that’s totally not a leading-question, is it?![]()
Garbage poll. Worthless.
Actually, this poll is explaining the state of Virginia right now. Education is the #1 issue for most of the electorate.
+1
The PP is seriously triggered because the poll doesn't say what she wants it to say. If it did, she'd call it 100% accurate.
PP made a valid point that this was a leading question. Are you you debating that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting poll release today from Tommy Schultz:
POLL
Q: "How much influence do you think parents of K-12 students should have over what schools teach?"
A: "Most or some":
Asian: 70%
Black: 67%
Hispanic: 67%
White: 75%
Suburban Women: 69%
A: "Not really":
Asian: 21%
Black: 22%
Hispanic: 27%
White: 19%
Suburban Women: 20%
Gee, that’s totally not a leading-question, is it?![]()
Garbage poll. Worthless.
Actually, this poll is explaining the state of Virginia right now. Education is the #1 issue for most of the electorate.
No, it’s the #1 issue for racists and fascists.
The rest of Virginia cares about REAL issues: climate change, equal rights for all genders, women’s health, immigrant rights, ending the culture of police violence, getting rid of guns, and righting all the wrongs of the past brought to us by white men like Youngkin.
I’d say education is very much a women’s issue. Closing schools unnecessarily cost many women their jobs and untold others their sanity.
The pandemic was detrimental to many, especially women.
That doesn’t mean you vote for the anti-woman candidate. WTAF?
DP. "Anti-woman candidate"? You're going to have to provide actual links for that absurd claim, doofus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
Liar. It’s not “a fact”.
Twenty-four hours again you all were falsely accusing people. Some were obviously not the same people.
Two of those have already be legit identified. NOT D staffers.
Where is your apology?
Where’s the names and ID of the two? Post some proof.
Lauren Windsor and her co-worker (shown in video).
https://www.vice.com/en/article/3abzaj/lincoln-project-posed-as-charlottesville-white-supremacists-at-youngkin-gop-event
NOT Dem staffers.
From your own link:
The Lincoln Project acknowledged they were behind the stunt after VICE News identified one of the people dressed in the photo in front of Youngkin’s campaign bus as a low-level Democratic operative who has recently been working for Democratic sting operator Lauren Windsor’s The Undercurrent.
That operative who attended the Charlottesville rally, furthest to the right in the above photo, can be seen on-camera in their most recent sting.
Right. He’s not a D staffer. Certainly not the one you all thought he was yesterday walking with TM. They didn’t even look alike.
Where is your apology?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am going with teachers unions. Parents shouldn’t be telling schools what to teach. I am so done with this era where everyone thinks they know more than experts.
Teachers' unions are not experts. Teachers unions are out to promote themselves--not the teachers and not the schools, and definitely not the students.
signed:
Experienced Teacher who learned this in my first year of teaching. Never saw anything over the years to change my mind.
Oh yeah? Where do you teach? In a public school system, or some kind of unaccredited bible-thumper private? I’m betting the latter based on your absurd post. It reads like typical anti-union trash talking points.
Union teachers are the only bulwark standing between society and the brainwashed spawn being raised and indoctrinated by their rightwing loon parents. If it weren’t for public school teachers offsetting all these idiot parents and their lunacy, we’d be up to our eyeballs in school age little fascists. Teachers are typically the only people exposing these kids to Progressive ideals and questioning the nonsense these children are being fed at home.
Assuming you aren't a troll, you are part of the problem. Many parents don't want teachers indoctrinating/pushing political ideologies in a public school classroom.
If you think teaching facts and kindness is a “political ideology” then private is probably a good choice for you.
You're right. My kid goes to a non religious private school in another country (we are from DC but husband is on a temp assignment) and he has a "values" class once a week. It's great actually- they teach basics like honesty, respect, responsibility, perseverance, flexibility, empathy, etc, ALL without some stupid "Progressive" lens that teaches kids to hate each other.
+100
Happy to have my kids taught all of the above - at school and at home. No "equity/racial bias" lens needed.
How can you have those things with inequality? With biases?
DP.
Who said anything about inequality? PP said "equity."
And, as the Democrats have hounded for the past year - equity does not mean equality.
We don't need "equity." We need equality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.
The news that releases on Wednesday, November 3rd at 8:00AM? Because it takes 72 hours to look at a photo, ask your neighbor 'Hey Chad - isn't that that douche that went to Georgetown and works for so-and-so who lives down the hall?', and then confirm the spelling of their name on linkedin?
Social media already positively identified (allegedly) 4 of the instigators.And if that's not enough all they had to do was charge the allegedly Lincoln/Democrat operative conspirator with defamation and get her to actually name the instigators in an emergency court order. That's if she actually has a list she can pull out from somewhere.
+1
If social media was relied on to positively identity the Jan. 6 rioters, then the same standard should apply here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You realize that McAuliffe has already been governor, right? This “socialist dystopia” that I’m seeing referenced to here didn’t happen. Virginia under the democratic governors has been a pretty well run state with reasonable taxes. Some of the things people are complaining about - permits, school things - are local elections. I made some non-D choices in my local elections, but for the state and federal, no way would I vote for what passes as the Republican Party today.
Yep and he can't seem to point to any accomplishments or efforts to highlight which is why people aren't voting for him.He's a Clinton campaign hack and the last thing we need right now - straight liars.
Youngkin is a liar.
Did you vote for Princess?
So you say and no. It wasn't Youngkin's campaign that had party operatives standing out in the rain under opposition property trying to fabricate a falsehood. LIARS.
It was performance art to remind voters of the type of people who supports Youngkin, who is linked closely to Trump, the worst president in history.
Exactly. “Both sides”.
And it wasn’t campaign staffers. You guys still owe them apologies.
In one of the pics, the guy is seen on his phone. We would have to see his subpoenaed phone records to see what he was doing and where he was at that time, to ensure it isn't him. Otherwise, I will take the blocked/deleted twitter accounts to be evidence of guilt.
Exactly. I'm not having a hard time at ALL believing the posts which identify these losers. Occam's Razor, and all that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting poll release today from Tommy Schultz:
POLL
Q: "How much influence do you think parents of K-12 students should have over what schools teach?"
A: "Most or some":
Asian: 70%
Black: 67%
Hispanic: 67%
White: 75%
Suburban Women: 69%
A: "Not really":
Asian: 21%
Black: 22%
Hispanic: 27%
White: 19%
Suburban Women: 20%
Gee, that’s totally not a leading-question, is it?![]()
Garbage poll. Worthless.
Actually, this poll is explaining the state of Virginia right now. Education is the #1 issue for most of the electorate.
+1
The PP is seriously triggered because the poll doesn't say what she wants it to say. If it did, she'd call it 100% accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting poll release today from Tommy Schultz:
POLL
Q: "How much influence do you think parents of K-12 students should have over what schools teach?"
A: "Most or some":
Asian: 70%
Black: 67%
Hispanic: 67%
White: 75%
Suburban Women: 69%
A: "Not really":
Asian: 21%
Black: 22%
Hispanic: 27%
White: 19%
Suburban Women: 20%
Gee, that’s totally not a leading-question, is it?![]()
Garbage poll. Worthless.
Actually, this poll is explaining the state of Virginia right now. Education is the #1 issue for most of the electorate.
No, it’s the #1 issue for racists and fascists.
The rest of Virginia cares about REAL issues: climate change, equal rights for all genders, women’s health, immigrant rights, ending the culture of police violence, getting rid of guns, and righting all the wrongs of the past brought to us by white men like Youngkin.
I’d say education is very much a women’s issue. Closing schools unnecessarily cost many women their jobs and untold others their sanity.
The pandemic was detrimental to many, especially women.
That doesn’t mean you vote for the anti-woman candidate. WTAF?
DP. "Anti-woman candidate"? You're going to have to provide actual links for that absurd claim, doofus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.
A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.
B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.
C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.
D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.
E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.
All roads lead to Terry.
Liar. It’s not “a fact”.
Twenty-four hours again you all were falsely accusing people. Some were obviously not the same people.
Two of those have already be legit identified. NOT D staffers.
Where is your apology?
Where’s the names and ID of the two? Post some proof.
Lauren Windsor and her co-worker (shown in video).
https://www.vice.com/en/article/3abzaj/lincoln-project-posed-as-charlottesville-white-supremacists-at-youngkin-gop-event
NOT Dem staffers.
From your own link:
The Lincoln Project acknowledged they were behind the stunt after VICE News identified one of the people dressed in the photo in front of Youngkin’s campaign bus as a low-level Democratic operative who has recently been working for Democratic sting operator Lauren Windsor’s The Undercurrent.
That operative who attended the Charlottesville rally, furthest to the right in the above photo, can be seen on-camera in their most recent sting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ What happened to believing women/victims?
I’m a woman. I can decide for myself who I believe and who not to. Intuition tells me she’s lying.
What if it were the daughter of a Democrat supporting McAuliffe. What would your intuition tell you then?
DP. What is this conversation in reference to?
A PP said she didn’t believe the Loudoun County high schooler who was sexually assaulted in a school restroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another here to report on the amazing crowd for Youngkin at an early hour on a Saturday morning. NOVA is going to shock on Tuesday
Wait until we see the Loudoun crowd tomorrow night.
Where in Loudoun will he be? Might try to go!
Did you already buy your tiki torches?
Oh wait - you still have the one you carried in Charlottesville back in 2017, don’t you?
My bad.
Everyone is tired of your race baiting identity politics. Go away. And go Winsome Sears!!!!
Winsome “Token” Sears? She’s not fooling anyone - people can see right through her. And Ayala is going to trounce her handily.
Wow, a liberal is posting this nonsense? Democrats are constantly accusing Republicans of being racists and here we have one poster making multiple racist comments on this forum tonight.
I actually think it's more than just that one. Several really racist comments, yet no liberal called them out. Such hypocrites.