First witness is an audio tech from Fairfax PD.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG he's implying she brought home work materials from SA victims and looked at them "often."

That’s a new low. I’m sure story teller Tess made up that part of his ridiculous story. She loves the gore of it all. Sickos.

You know how people who are guilty of something are the first to accuse others of the same? Like how a cheater is the first to accuse their spouse of having an affair?

BB is in law enforcement, and clearly gets off on the idea of committing the perfect crime and getting away with it.

So of course he thinks it is perfectly reasonable to accuse his wife of getting off on the stuff she dealt with at work. Stuff that would make any normal, sane person feel sick to their stomach, not aroused. But he doesn't see it that way because he thinks everyone is as big a psychopath as he is, and thinks this will make sense to everyone. Instead it just makes it more obvious how sick HE is.

Keep us posted everyone.

So they expect everything to be wrapped up by cob tomorrow?

Did CW say how long her closing was?

Anonymous wrote:who is t patrick smith ?!?!?

We'll find out at 3:15! Posted earlier that he's a Vienna attorney who also does work with the IRS.

That he reached out to the prosecution after hearing BB's testimony is huge.

who is t patrick smith ?!?!?

Defense rests on a strange note ("Was it a dog? Maybe." "Could it have been a human? Maybe.")

Two rebuttal witnesses the prosecution says will take 15 minutes combined, closing arguments tomorrow.

Anonymous wrote:Only 15 minutes rebuttal?
CW has been amazing but that makes me a tad nervous

I feel the same, but hopefully they see that the entire story is ludicrous.

Anonymous wrote:OMG he's implying she brought home work materials from SA victims and looked at them "often."

people into BDSM don't get off on SA photos, this is like saying someone that enjoys watching horror movies masturbates to come scene photos... this is so disgusting and stupid! I sure hope the jury sees through this crap

Only 15 minutes rebuttal?
CW has been amazing but that makes me a tad nervous

Anonymous wrote:Did I miss something or did he say CB was on her knees but then said the knife was inside CB’s hair?

He said she was on "all fours" (jerk) and then got up on her knees when he came into the room, and yes he said the knife was in her hair which didn't really make sense, but you heard right.

Break now. Two rebuttal witnesses the CW says will total 15 minutes, then jury instructions and they will do closings tomorrow.

Did I miss something or did he say CB was on her knees but then said the knife was inside CB’s hair?

Anonymous wrote:If BB is not convicted, does Juliana still get her deal ?

yes

If BB is not convicted, does Juliana still get her deal ?

Anonymous wrote:OMG he's implying she brought home work materials from SA victims and looked at them "often."

That’s a new low. I’m sure story teller Tess made up that part of his ridiculous story. She loves the gore of it all. Sickos.