Anonymous wrote:Btw, people who aren’t rich don’t have fancy running shorts, or perfect jogging shoes. I always just wore old, comfortable clothes to exercise.

He was an athlete. Athletes don't go running in cargo shorts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Btw, people who aren’t rich don’t have fancy running shorts, or perfect jogging shoes. I always just wore old, comfortable clothes to exercise.

He is wearing running/athletic shorts.

It was cargo shorts. I saw the photos of them from the medical examiner.

No they are not.

Anonymous wrote:The lawyer for the defendants doesn’t have much to defend. I didn't follow the trial. Is she hired or a public defense lawyer?

That’s the lawyer for Greg McMichael. The other defendants have male lead attorneys.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Btw, people who aren’t rich don’t have fancy running shorts, or perfect jogging shoes. I always just wore old, comfortable clothes to exercise.

He is wearing running/athletic shorts.

It was cargo shorts. I saw the photos of them from the medical examiner.

Anonymous wrote:Btw, people who aren’t rich don’t have fancy running shorts, or perfect jogging shoes. I always just wore old, comfortable clothes to exercise.

He is wearing running/athletic shorts.

The lawyer for the defendants doesn’t have much to defend. I didn't follow the trial. Is she hired or a public defense lawyer?

I would sell my house if I lived in that neighborhood. There should be a marker to remind people of his death.

Regardless of whether he was a jogger that day per se, I grew up in a neighborhood with new builds popping up, and I remember going to peak inside as a kid. It's not totally unexpected. That's why the owner put up a camera, because people do that. Owner said he feels bad this happened.

Btw, people who aren’t rich don’t have fancy running shorts, or perfect jogging shoes. I always just wore old, comfortable clothes to exercise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else catch the comments of the defense lawyer who said the following about Arbery:

"Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails," Hogue told jurors.

I've never before seen such a blatant appeal to the basest instincts of an almost all-white jury. It's outrageous and deliberate and confirms that, among other biases, racism is alive and well.

https://www.wjcl.com/article/ahmaud-arbery-long-dirty-toenails/38330260#

She’s an a$$hole.

I think it is pretty obvious that she is pointing out he wasn't out there jogging for his health. Not very polite rhetoric and it won't change a thing in the case but that's her point.

The bigger problem is the family having racist divisive figures like Sharpton and Jackson. Obviously to intimidate the jury which might backfire.
At this point I think it's been well established why he kept going back to that construction site. The neighbors had valid reason to pursue (though not wise), and ask why he kept going into their neighbors home. Obviously the one didn't expect to be attacked, nor his gun taken.

The problem is he was wearing jogging shorts but she used alt-right imagery that he had “khakis” on, which is a lie.

I heard the testimony that he was wearing khaki cargo shorts....not jogging attire. Where I you hearing he was wearing jogging shorts?

The racist told the cops in their interviews that he was wearing tan sweat shorts. An alt-right group spread the lie he was wearing cargo shorts. So you were duped by alt-right Rhetoric.

The evidence shows he was wearing light tan running shorts.

They were cargo shorts. The alt-right doctored photos to show him in boots, instead of the white Nikes he was actually wearing, and said he lived 20miles away. It was actually 1.8 miles away.

God I hope these racists murderers get sent away for a very long time!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else catch the comments of the defense lawyer who said the following about Arbery:

"Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails," Hogue told jurors.

I've never before seen such a blatant appeal to the basest instincts of an almost all-white jury. It's outrageous and deliberate and confirms that, among other biases, racism is alive and well.

https://www.wjcl.com/article/ahmaud-arbery-long-dirty-toenails/38330260#

She’s an a$$hole.

I think it is pretty obvious that she is pointing out he wasn't out there jogging for his health. Not very polite rhetoric and it won't change a thing in the case but that's her point.

The bigger problem is the family having racist divisive figures like Sharpton and Jackson. Obviously to intimidate the jury which might backfire.
At this point I think it's been well established why he kept going back to that construction site. The neighbors had valid reason to pursue (though not wise), and ask why he kept going into their neighbors home. Obviously the one didn't expect to be attacked, nor his gun taken.

The problem is he was wearing jogging shorts but she used alt-right imagery that he had “khakis” on, which is a lie.

I heard the testimony that he was wearing khaki cargo shorts....not jogging attire. Where I you hearing he was wearing jogging shorts?

The shorts are relevant how?

It relevant because he was wearing running shorts…. But alt -right groups spread lies he was wearing cargo shorts, the defense attorney said he was wearing “khakis” which sound like “cargo shorts” not running shorts. She can say khaki because it’s a color that is a reasonable description or his shorts but it’s racist because she wants jurors to think “cargo shorts” instead of tan running shorts. I guess they think you commit crimes in khakis instead of running shorts amc that justification for killing an innocent man in cold blood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else catch the comments of the defense lawyer who said the following about Arbery:

"Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails," Hogue told jurors.

I've never before seen such a blatant appeal to the basest instincts of an almost all-white jury. It's outrageous and deliberate and confirms that, among other biases, racism is alive and well.

https://www.wjcl.com/article/ahmaud-arbery-long-dirty-toenails/38330260#

She’s an a$$hole.

I think it is pretty obvious that she is pointing out he wasn't out there jogging for his health. Not very polite rhetoric and it won't change a thing in the case but that's her point.

The bigger problem is the family having racist divisive figures like Sharpton and Jackson. Obviously to intimidate the jury which might backfire.
At this point I think it's been well established why he kept going back to that construction site. The neighbors had valid reason to pursue (though not wise), and ask why he kept going into their neighbors home. Obviously the one didn't expect to be attacked, nor his gun taken.

The problem is he was wearing jogging shorts but she used alt-right imagery that he had “khakis” on, which is a lie.

I heard the testimony that he was wearing khaki cargo shorts....not jogging attire. Where I you hearing he was wearing jogging shorts?

The racist told the cops in their interviews that he was wearing tan sweat shorts. An alt-right group spread the lie he was wearing cargo shorts. So you were duped by alt-right Rhetoric.

The evidence shows he was wearing light tan running shorts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else catch the comments of the defense lawyer who said the following about Arbery:

"Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails," Hogue told jurors.

I've never before seen such a blatant appeal to the basest instincts of an almost all-white jury. It's outrageous and deliberate and confirms that, among other biases, racism is alive and well.

https://www.wjcl.com/article/ahmaud-arbery-long-dirty-toenails/38330260#

She’s an a$$hole.

I think it is pretty obvious that she is pointing out he wasn't out there jogging for his health. Not very polite rhetoric and it won't change a thing in the case but that's her point.

The bigger problem is the family having racist divisive figures like Sharpton and Jackson. Obviously to intimidate the jury which might backfire.
At this point I think it's been well established why he kept going back to that construction site. The neighbors had valid reason to pursue (though not wise), and ask why he kept going into their neighbors home. Obviously the one didn't expect to be attacked, nor his gun taken.

The problem is he was wearing jogging shorts but she used alt-right imagery that he had “khakis” on, which is a lie.

I heard the testimony that he was wearing khaki cargo shorts....not jogging attire. Where I you hearing he was wearing jogging shorts?

The shorts are relevant how?

I don't know if they are relevant to the actions directly before his death, but I think his attire was used to suggest that he wasn't just out jogging for exercise.

I’ve seen people at the gym on the elliptical in jeans so….

Anonymous wrote:No verdict tonight. Jury will reconvene tomorrow at 8:30.

Wow. I thought it would be quick.