Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did Clyde do to anger 05 players and parents. If he is the "Yoda" of youth coaching, why would players leave?
Clyde had nothing to do with the players departures, he took over the team after the players left. The team is now one of the best teams in this area.
Wrong. He coached the team at the U-13 ECNL age group. The departures took place after that season when 10 players left for the DA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did Clyde do to anger 05 players and parents. If he is the "Yoda" of youth coaching, why would players leave?
Clyde had nothing to do with the players departures, he took over the team after the players left. The team is now one of the best teams in this area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?
I heard they spread out between Metro United and Arlington. I don't think any went to FCV, though not sure if any tried out.
Anonymous wrote:Yes 07 is a gap year. Recruiting not over yet.
Anonymous wrote:What did Clyde do to anger 05 players and parents. If he is the "Yoda" of youth coaching, why would players leave?
Anonymous wrote:What did Clyde do to anger 05 players and parents. If he is the "Yoda" of youth coaching, why would players leave?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?
Metro United
Metro united? Bwahaha! Oh yeah sooooo much better
Count Chocula? Is that you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?
Metro United
Metro united? Bwahaha! Oh yeah sooooo much better
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?
Metro United
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ McLean has too much turnover and weak at the younger ages.
McLean is to blame for their turnover. If they would learn to stick with their current players and not recruit over top of them they would stay strong. Instead they go out recruiting. Most of the players they bring in are not top players and it makes their current ones unhappy and they leave. McLean 2005 team would be a powerhouse if they hadn't brought in a bunch of new girls and benched the better ones. 2/3 of the team left. They are doing above average now but I would argue that they would be a top team had Clyde not angered so many of his parents. The McLean 2008 team has lost top players to Arlington and FCV this year.
Where did the McLean 05 girls go?