Anonymous wrote:Yeah, better to just do away with testing and standards and just PRETEND THE GAP DOESN'T EXIST and that everything is just A-OK and hunky-dory, which is the anti-CCers "solution."
And, what have you done to close the Achievement gap?
Anonymous wrote:
What's your fix? Oh, that's right. You don't have one. You just sit in an armchair and bitch.
No. Actually, that is not true. My suggestion for others who want to help is to pitch in.
Yeah, better to just do away with testing and standards and just PRETEND THE GAP DOESN'T EXIST and that everything is just A-OK and hunky-dory, which is the anti-CCers "solution."
Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps are not new, nor are they caused by or the fault of testing, nor are they caused by or the fault of Common Core.
This is true. Testing and CC will just make the gap worse-or better, if you close the gap from the top.
Yeah, better to just do away with testing and standards and just PRETEND THE GAP DOESN'T EXIST and that everything is just A-OK and hunky-dory, which is the anti-CCers "solution."
What's your fix? Oh, that's right. You don't have one. You just sit in an armchair and bitch.
Anonymous wrote:
Achievement gaps are not new, nor are they caused by or the fault of testing, nor are they caused by or the fault of Common Core.
Yet apparently you think that abolishing testing and standards will somehow change that.
Thought Common Core "standards" were supposed to fix that.
Achievement gaps are not new, nor are they caused by or the fault of testing, nor are they caused by or the fault of Common Core.
This is true. Testing and CC will just make the gap worse-or better, if you close the gap from the top.
Anonymous wrote:
Achievement gaps are not new, nor are they caused by or the fault of testing, nor are they caused by or the fault of Common Core.
Yet apparently you think that abolishing testing and standards will somehow change that.
Thought Common Core "standards" were supposed to fix that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is this supposed evidence?
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
It's all here. Massive failure rates predicted for all students, but especially those of color or with any disability.
Straight from Smarter Balanced.
http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Disaggregated-FieldTestDataFINAL.pdf
Achievement gaps are not new, nor are they caused by or the fault of testing, nor are they caused by or the fault of Common Core.
Yet apparently you think that abolishing testing and standards will somehow change that.
You really don't understand how ANYTHING works, do you? And then, you ridiculously want to presume to proclaim those things that you clearly do not understand as "delusional?" Laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is this supposed evidence?
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
It's all here. Massive failure rates predicted for all students, but especially those of color or with any disability.
Straight from Smarter Balanced.
http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Disaggregated-FieldTestDataFINAL.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Where is this supposed evidence?
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
It's well known that New York State had a botched rollout, and that's a state implementation issue. It doesn't necessarily indicate anything about anywhere else.
Race To The Top is competetive grant funding that states OPT INTO. Race To The Top is not mandatory. It is state choice. And when states do opt in, they develop their OWN evaluation policies and criteria.
It is federal taxpayer money. Do you not get that?