Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The democrats look stupid holding up signs.

Right. They are trying to say the republic is about to fail/be irretrievably corrupted/appoint a dictator for life and oh here is the evil evil evil person who is going to destroy the US forever, I know lets hold up little signs, that’s gonna show him.

🙄

So pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

Slotkin failed to vigorously stand up for the rights of LGTBQIA++ folks, and especially transgender teen athletes who t-rump unfairly attacked viciously.

Anonymous wrote:The democrats look stupid holding up signs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain how stopping trans people from participating in life has made your own life better? Do you personally know a trans person who has made your life harder? Can you give me personal specific examples?

Sorry - can you give an example of anyone stopping trans people from "participating in life"? No, you can't. They can still play sports and do any other things they want and you know it.

OK - can you explain how banning trans people from partitioning in life will benefit your life personally?

What?

Well, I don't want anyone to impede on my right to partition in life.

Anonymous wrote:The democrats look stupid holding up signs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain how stopping trans people from participating in life has made your own life better? Do you personally know a trans person who has made your life harder? Can you give me personal specific examples?

Sorry - can you give an example of anyone stopping trans people from "participating in life"? No, you can't. They can still play sports and do any other things they want and you know it.

OK - can you explain how banning trans people from partitioning in life will benefit your life personally?

What?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how Trump's ear cartilage grew back.

No mark of any kind. It's like he'd never even been shot. Amaaaazing.

Don't let Trump's win derange you to this degree. Going full truther about a gunshot everyone saw won't help anything.

Can you explain how his cartilage doesn't have a scar or hole or any mark whatsoever? I mean, its a miracle!

Conspiracy theorist in the house ^^
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fbi-confirms-bullet-struck-trumps-ear-assassination-attempt-rcna163896

Gee you MAGAs love spreading false conspiracy theories like "ThE 2020 eLEcTION wAS StoLEn" and "J6 wAs AntIFa aND FeDBoiS" et cetera et cetera et cetera so it makes it ironic and hypocritical that you wouldn't enjoy a good conspiracy theory from the other side.

And we never got any kind of actual medical report about Trump's ear, nor anything else about his health that is believable (yea sure he's 200lbs with those size 50 pants). Why is that? What are they covering up?

Bless your heart. You are adorable.

Lol you truly have no answers. That's not a me problem, that's a you problem.

Anonymous wrote:The democrats look stupid holding up signs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain how stopping trans people from participating in life has made your own life better? Do you personally know a trans person who has made your life harder? Can you give me personal specific examples?

Sorry - can you give an example of anyone stopping trans people from "participating in life"? No, you can't. They can still play sports and do any other things they want and you know it.

OK - can you explain how banning trans people from partitioning in life will benefit your life personally?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump actually called out what he was exposing, that Democrats will not celebrate anything good because Trump.

What was shocking to me is that it didn’t appear to be any type of group consensus of what to do for this speech. They should have just skipped, it would have been a much stronger message.

They certainly would have looked more mature by just skipping instead of sitting there in Barbie pink with their little signs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems dressed in pink to support women yet voted against banning men from women’s sports?

Are you kidding me??? lol

It's weird this bothers you more than the fact we are now governed by a full blown autocrat. It's scary as crap how crazy and incompetent this man is.

He has sense enough to know that biological men should not be playing against girls. If you think that is okay, I prefer Trump's point.

+1
This is common sense - something Democrats are sorely lacking.

So nice for you that you didn't have a kid coming up who was questioning their identity but still wanted to play middle or high school sports.

Which again, is why we need a transgender league where kids can *fairly* play against other transgender kids. Do you think it's fair to allow a biological boy to beat biological girls?

I recall when Riley Gaines went on her tour of all of the conservative outlets yammering about how she got beaten in swimming by a biological male. That biological male came in 5th place and got beaten by 4 females who were better. Riley Gaines wouldn't have won without males. She was just an attention seeking grifter.

A man doesn't belong in women's sports just like an adult doesn't belong in little league. You seem to be really struggling with that basic fact.

Seems to me Riley Gaines wasn't good enough to compete in top tier girls athletics and you seem to be struggling with that.

William Thomas and his scrotum have no place in women's sports regardless of Riley Gaines' athletic ability. Hope that helps.

And you want to lift every little girl's skirt to make sure she doesn't have a scrotum, sicko. https://www.newsweek.com/kansas-republicans-pass-bill-genital-examinations-schoolchildren-students-transgender-1792954

DP. I guess every time you post this, I'll just counter with this:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/04/06/kansas-legislature-sports/

Sorry but your Snopes "rebuttal" isn't much of a rebuttal, it leaves it as "unclear" which means genital inspections are not at all out of scope.

It doesn't mean that's what they were talking about, either. In short, no one has stated genital exams will be used. Far more likely will be a DNA swab. But keep pushing your faux outrage and hysteria.

If the plan was to use DNA swabs then why didn't the legislature or any Republican spokesperson just say so? FAIL.

Republicans are pedo perverts. https://www.newsweek.com/kansas-republicans-pass-bill-genital-examinations-schoolchildren-students-transgender-1792954

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems dressed in pink to support women yet voted against banning men from women’s sports?

Are you kidding me??? lol

It's weird this bothers you more than the fact we are now governed by a full blown autocrat. It's scary as crap how crazy and incompetent this man is.

He has sense enough to know that biological men should not be playing against girls. If you think that is okay, I prefer Trump's point.

You have seized on this so you don't have to pay attention to any other issues.

It is a perfect example of how stupid and out of touch Democrats are. A vast majority of Americans are opposed to men in women's sports because most people have common sense. Only the woke idiots are in favor of something so ridiculous and harmful to actual women and girls. Democrats clearly haven't learned a thing because they keep doubling down on it.

It's a matter of degree. I don't agree with transwomen in the Olympics but a kid on a rec team who is experiencing gender dysmorphia? Of course they should play. Republicans are extremist on this issue.

Some of the Republicans were actually pushing for having random school personnel conduct genital examinations of girls as young as 5 years old before even allowing them to play with other girls on the playground. I'm not kidding, it's disgusting how extreme many of them are.

What a liar you are.
DP

not a lie
https://ohiohouse.gov/news/democrat/ohio-republicans-want-to-force-children-to-undergo-genital-exams-to-play-high-school-sports-110422

There has been no concrete statement or evidence saying genital exams would be used. This goes for Ohio too.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/04/06/kansas-legislature-sports/

Republicans are pedo perverts.

Genital exams for little girls. Disgusting.
https://www.newsweek.com/kansas-republicans-pass-bill-genital-examinations-schoolchildren-students-transgender-1792954

https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/04/06/kansas-legislature-sports/

Snopes ruling of "unclear" doesn't debunk anything nor does it make Republicans any less a bunch of pedo perverts.