Anonymous wrote:What does this mean to you? Because in academia these days, the sacred cow is far-left ideology.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
If you think plagiarism is wrong and dishonest, then you wouldn't follow anyone's lead -- whether it be Ackman, Trump, or anyone else.
Characterizing what Gay did as plagiarism is laughably absurd.
Now what Oxman did, and who she associated with?
Really? When I was in college, we had an honor code. Copying paragraphs was viewed as cheating/plagiarism and worthy of expulsion.
Except Gay didn't copy paragraphs, or copy anything. She neglected to insert quotation marks, making no effort to represent the words as her own. But carry on with the propaganda campaign because she did, after all, fail to bow down and cower before the sacred cow. And for that, maybe she should have been made to pay an even greater price, right? Right?
What does this mean to you? Because in academia these days, the sacred cow is far-left ideology.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
If you think plagiarism is wrong and dishonest, then you wouldn't follow anyone's lead -- whether it be Ackman, Trump, or anyone else.
Characterizing what Gay did as plagiarism is laughably absurd.
Now what Oxman did, and who she associated with?
Really? When I was in college, we had an honor code. Copying paragraphs was viewed as cheating/plagiarism and worthy of expulsion.
Except Gay didn't copy paragraphs, or copy anything. She neglected to insert quotation marks, making no effort to represent the words as her own. But carry on with the propaganda campaign because she did, after all, fail to bow down and cower before the sacred cow. And for that, maybe she should have been made to pay an even greater price, right? Right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
If you think plagiarism is wrong and dishonest, then you wouldn't follow anyone's lead -- whether it be Ackman, Trump, or anyone else.
Characterizing what Gay did as plagiarism is laughably absurd.
Now what Oxman did, and who she associated with?
Really? When I was in college, we had an honor code. Copying paragraphs was viewed as cheating/plagiarism and worthy of expulsion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Great, now she can be on par with mediocre white men who have been in charge since the beginning.
You mean the ones that built it?
Anonymous wrote:
Great, now she can be on par with mediocre white men who have been in charge since the beginning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
If you think plagiarism is wrong and dishonest, then you wouldn't follow anyone's lead -- whether it be Ackman, Trump, or anyone else.
Characterizing what Gay did as plagiarism is laughably absurd.
Now what Oxman did, and who she associated with?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
If you think plagiarism is wrong and dishonest, then you wouldn't follow anyone's lead -- whether it be Ackman, Trump, or anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Just following Ackman’s lead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard Board under the guise of DEI tried to elevate an unqualified person to be president of Harvard. They couldn’t predict world events and their candidate got caught up in an issue beyond her capabilities.
Other universities had the same issue and are suffering because of incompetent leadership. Other presidents will have to leave as well. But some universities had competent leadership and weathered the storm.
Did I miss anything?
Anonymous wrote:Harvard Board under the guise of DEI tried to elevate an unqualified person to be president of Harvard. They couldn’t predict world events and their candidate got caught up in an issue beyond her capabilities.
Other universities had the same issue and are suffering because of incompetent leadership. Other presidents will have to leave as well. But some universities had competent leadership and weathered the storm.
Did I miss anything?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Obviously, you think plagiarizing other people's work is acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guy Bill Ackman is still at it.
He announced yesterday via Twitter/X plans to investigate every professor at MIT for plagiarism.
And Sally thought she dodged the bullet.
If they did not plagiarize public documents they published, they have nothing whatsoever to fear,
Right?
+1
No it was about not being pro Israel enough. You can never be pro Israel enough. Plagiarism is okay for Ackman’s wife but not for a non Jew in a position of power at an Ivy League. We can look at the example of Yale.
So you think plagiarism is alright? No big deal?
Well, Ackman seems to thinks plagiarism is alright and no big deal - in certain circumstances, of course. Since he's holding the pitchfork and torch, can we just apply his own shaky methods and deem it OK for those we like, but not OK for those we don't care for?
PP here. That's not what I asked. I asked if you think plagiarism is alright. Do you work at Harvard? Harvard should care if anyone attending/instructing there or leading their institution plagiarizes.
Obviously you want to find a convenient, tidy justification for the unhinged witch hunt that buffoon went on for absurdly transparent reasons that had nothing to do with academic integrity.