Anonymous wrote:All I know is that a 35 ACT and 800 math 2 SAT with meh grades at a big 3 got absolutely no competitive admits for my kid. Big waste.
Anonymous wrote:All I know is that a 35 ACT and 800 math 2 SAT with meh grades at a big 3 got absolutely no competitive admits for my kid. Big waste.
Anonymous wrote:All I know is that a 35 ACT and 800 math 2 SAT with meh grades at a big 3 got absolutely no competitive admits for my kid. Big waste.
Anonymous wrote:My DC attended what many of you on this forum would consider a second-tier, local private school and thrived there. DC now attends a university which all of you on this forum would consider the very top tier. It matters not so much where you attend school, as what you make of the school you attend and the education you receive.
Anonymous wrote:My kid wouldn't make it into a top school regardless of whether she was in private or public. She's a great kid but she's only a fair-to-middling student. She shifted from public to private because the private school is what she needed at that point in time. She is a better, more committed student because there is an incentive to do well at her private school. That's why we're spending the money on private school, not college placement.
I'm not worried about the fact that she won't go to a top 25 university. I've known lots of successful people who did not go to top schools. I'm more concerned she attend a school that fits her.
Best to think about what suits your kid at that particular time and not worry about college. People with toddlers will be surprised at how their best laid plans have a way of going haywire when it comes to what children end up doing/being as they grow older.
Anonymous wrote:We live in Fairfax county, with an excellent high school. We moved here specifically for the public HS. So now our kids are going to a private HS!! First, in order to get into a really good college from a ppublic HS in Fairfax, your MUST have a super high gpa and have taken ALL AP/honors. That is becasue college counselors know even the best public high schools are easier academically than privates. The privates have smaller classes, excellent teachers that are very responsive to parents that pay high tuition, and more creative teaching. They are much more rigorous. Becasue the colleges know this, they have a bump up on getting into the better schools. As far as "caring less about the ivy league" that is just ignorant and small town thinking. even tho this country has become more diverse and understanding, they ivies STILL rule this country. The connections, the education etc is just beyond comprehension. And yes, if you pay scads of $$ to a private you do expect the second reason--in addition to the quality education and personalized attention--is acceptance into a very good college. My children love thier private school. It is student oriented. The very large, very bureacratic public high school here would cause them to be lost souls. Not to mention large classes.In the public high schools, the curriculum is excellent--however their teaching method consists of "throw them in the water and tell them to swim". My kids homework at their private is rigorous and in depth learning. The public school homeowrk was busywork, rote learning and superficial fact memorization. My kids did well but they were bored. School was a chore. Now, they LOVE learning!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are too young to know what kind of students they will be in high school. However, I do know that what I want for their pre-college education is lots of experiences in a variety of subjects (including art, music, etc.), the development of good work/study habits, and a love of learning. They are at a rigorous academic school right now, and one thing for which we will watch is whether their schools become too much of a pressure cooker at some point. If it does, we will make a change. Based on where things stand currently, it likely would not be a public school, but who knows where school budgets and classes in things like the arts will be at that point?
When it comes to college placement, I want them to go to the colleges that best suit them depending on their interests at that time. I don't care if it is a top 25 school - and I went to one.
Where are people getting the idea that public schools do not teach art, music, work/study habits and instill a love of learning? My public schools did; my kids' public school does. Which ones don't?
Anonymous wrote:My kids are too young to know what kind of students they will be in high school. However, I do know that what I want for their pre-college education is lots of experiences in a variety of subjects (including art, music, etc.), the development of good work/study habits, and a love of learning. They are at a rigorous academic school right now, and one thing for which we will watch is whether their schools become too much of a pressure cooker at some point. If it does, we will make a change. Based on where things stand currently, it likely would not be a public school, but who knows where school budgets and classes in things like the arts will be at that point?
When it comes to college placement, I want them to go to the colleges that best suit them depending on their interests at that time. I don't care if it is a top 25 school - and I went to one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I couldn't agree with 13:37 more. My goal for my kids was to send them to a school where they would learn how to *learn,* to learn how to study; to think critically and to be exposed to great teaching in a stimulating environment. From the list of college acceptances at our school, I assume my kids will do just fine. I think there's a better shot of getting into a very good school from private when you're not necessarily at the top of your class then if you're in the middle at a big public. I could care less about the Ivy League - there are so many first-rate colleges and universities in this country and great grad schools also. In addition, I assume that my kids will be very well prepared for college as a result of their education in high school, unlike their dear old mom.
But a kid who is in the middle of his class at an academically competitive private perhaps would have been at the top of the class at a public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I couldn't agree with 13:37 more. My goal for my kids was to send them to a school where they would learn how to *learn,* to learn how to study; to think critically and to be exposed to great teaching in a stimulating environment. From the list of college acceptances at our school, I assume my kids will do just fine. I think there's a better shot of getting into a very good school from private when you're not necessarily at the top of your class then if you're in the middle at a big public. I could care less about the Ivy League - there are so many first-rate colleges and universities in this country and great grad schools also. In addition, I assume that my kids will be very well prepared for college as a result of their education in high school, unlike their dear old mom.
But a kid who is in the middle of his class at an academically competitive private perhaps would have been at the top of the class at a public.
That's an ignorant statement.
Nothing ignorant about my statement if you read the "perhaps" in it.