Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.
None of this is remotely true.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.
The Republicans don’t know anything about that.
They are seriously so dumb and misguided, but worse is that they think they know more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News
b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.
Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?
I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?
Assumed they had some inside help taking over the Capitol. It's so nice for Tucker to let us see who helped them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?
Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Tucker Carlson's old producer isn't conservative? LOL
Just imagine the epic frenzied tizzy Republicans would be in if somebody from the Post, Times, or CNN said this. Too bad Fox's viewers will never hear of it.
Paul Ryan is on the board. Fox News has changed over the past few years.
Dude, Tucker feels the same way. Read his texts, he despises Trump!
Just admit that you have been conned.
I haven't been anythinged as I've never been much of a Fox fan or Tucker fan. I don't care who likes or who despises Trump. That's not important. What's important to me is due process for these men and women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News
b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.
Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?
I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?
You have video of that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News
b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.
Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?
I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?
Anonymous wrote:
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News
b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.
Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?
I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?
+1