Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
It would be completely non-sensical if this were to happen, because an unvaccinated pre-K student is more protected from COVID than a vaccinated adult.
I'll say it again -- the flu is more dangerous for pre-K kids than COVID, and yet somehow we managed to send kids to daycare and pre-K quite safely without masks before 2020.
There are very, very few places in the US and in the world that are requiring 2-, 3- and 4-year-olds to mask because it is idiotic. This was clear by mid-2020 to anyone with a brain paying attention to studies on COVID transmission and incidence.
NY is lifting the indoor mandate in schools except for those under 5. FFS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
It would be completely non-sensical if this were to happen, because an unvaccinated pre-K student is more protected from COVID than a vaccinated adult.
I'll say it again -- the flu is more dangerous for pre-K kids than COVID, and yet somehow we managed to send kids to daycare and pre-K quite safely without masks before 2020.
There are very, very few places in the US and in the world that are requiring 2-, 3- and 4-year-olds to mask because it is idiotic. This was clear by mid-2020 to anyone with a brain paying attention to studies on COVID transmission and incidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
Does CDC recommend that 3-4 year olds continue to mask indoors? That's all that is relevant here. Or should be.
DCPS doesn't seem to really be using the CDC recommendations so that wont be factored in I'm sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
Does CDC recommend that 3-4 year olds continue to mask indoors? That's all that is relevant here. Or should be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Do they have public pre-k in Chicago? I feel like Pre-K being in the building (and mostly 4 year olds unable to vaccinated in those room) is what will hold us back in DC from lifting it by the end of the school year. Even though there is very little to no mixing of Pre-K kids with the greater school population. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Chicago will likely drop their indoor school mask mandate soon - like in the next 2 weeks,
Anonymous wrote:My fed agency just sent a notification out that masks are no longer required inside (as we're all preparing to return to work). This is so incredibly unfair to my 3 year old. It is so depressing and I feel really sorry for her. To what end we're doing, I really can't tell. For godsake, she is still wearing a mask OUTSIDE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep getting reminders and emails from my JKLM to sign up for spring fundraising events. I have approximately zero interest in supporting a school system that continues to advocate for keeping our kids masked, while simultaneously gathering parents for unmasked parties. I wonder if this might be a useful angle for advocacy. Recognizing the mayor could care less about PTAs, vocally withholding monetary support could mobilize the PTAs to start realizing how pissed off parents are...
Lol the most amusing part of the past 2 years is seeing all of the angry white people realize the limits of their white privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep getting reminders and emails from my JKLM to sign up for spring fundraising events. I have approximately zero interest in supporting a school system that continues to advocate for keeping our kids masked, while simultaneously gathering parents for unmasked parties. I wonder if this might be a useful angle for advocacy. Recognizing the mayor could care less about PTAs, vocally withholding monetary support could mobilize the PTAs to start realizing how pissed off parents are…
Lol the most amusing part of the past 2 years is seeing all of the angry white people realize the limits of their white privilege.
Really? For me its been watching smug liberals like you piss away their governing majority, lol!
+1 except I haven’t found it amusing, because there are a lot of liberal causes I support and care about. It’s painful to watch our ability to pursue those slip away due to Covid-caution extremism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep getting reminders and emails from my JKLM to sign up for spring fundraising events. I have approximately zero interest in supporting a school system that continues to advocate for keeping our kids masked, while simultaneously gathering parents for unmasked parties. I wonder if this might be a useful angle for advocacy. Recognizing the mayor could care less about PTAs, vocally withholding monetary support could mobilize the PTAs to start realizing how pissed off parents are...
Lol the most amusing part of the past 2 years is seeing all of the angry white people realize the limits of their white privilege.
Really? For me its been watching smug liberals like you piss away their governing majority, lol!