Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over/Under on the number of changes and new additions to capital blue tomorrow?
3
6
If it is 6, that is a severe misjudgment of talent last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over/Under on the number of changes and new additions to capital blue tomorrow?
3
6
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over/Under on the number of changes and new additions to capital blue tomorrow?
3
6
Anonymous wrote:Over/Under on the number of changes and new additions to capital blue tomorrow?
3
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, this is an actual BF parent. BF can play with SSSA, but will get the a$$es handed to them by the end. BF doesn’t quite have the depth. Doesn’t mean they don’t have good players, but no, they are not there.
So, please stop debating it and putting the girls down. Everyone did their best. Where they lands is whether they land. I hope all of the girls land where their talents are
Good luck and let’s stay positive
The thing about the SSSAS team is that since there are no substitutions, the players on the field will be same players (now seniors) who have been playing nearly every minute of every game together since Freshman year.
But why did those girls start on varsity as freshman and the current batch of 28s couldnt crack the lineup? Serious question
Freshman were not allowed to tryout. The 2026s are an anomaly year in terms of talent. I think this extends beyond this particular school and beyond the region.