Anonymous wrote:Hey, this is an actual BF parent. BF can play with SSSA, but will get the a$$es handed to them by the end. BF doesn’t quite have the depth. Doesn’t mean they don’t have good players, but no, they are not there.
So, please stop debating it and putting the girls down. Everyone did their best. Where they lands is whether they land. I hope all of the girls land where their talents are
Good luck and let’s stay positive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep. The Battlefield girls are better than any of the SSSAS, Visi and Potomac girls. You should have seen them at the tryouts. Blazing 300 times, unbreakable defense and unstoppable attack.
Oooh. Do tell!
So you were an evaluator?
You are not very bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If my daughter was just surrounded with the best players in the country on her team then they would only need an upgrade at one position….lol. They don’t need “upgrades”. They just need to keep playing. You only get better by challenging yourself and your team against great competition. Most of these posts are from dads who are bitter that they are past their prime and trying to live their athletic triumphs through their daughter.
The True test of private school politics will be seen if some of the current players remain on blue over players who were new last night
I'm honestly confused about the private school politics comment. Seriously, how are you thinking private school politics would come into play here?
If there are so many changes to be made, then they did not pick the right girls last year. They picked on KJs and other private school coaches recommendations and not on skill.
Yeah why would they take girls that go to schools that let me check my notes....... All appeared in the NATIONAL TOP 25 rankings at some point this past season. Idiots, they obviously should pick players who won the prestigious Cedar Run District Championship. Absolute farce of a club...
You mean girls who played JV for those schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If my daughter was just surrounded with the best players in the country on her team then they would only need an upgrade at one position….lol. They don’t need “upgrades”. They just need to keep playing. You only get better by challenging yourself and your team against great competition. Most of these posts are from dads who are bitter that they are past their prime and trying to live their athletic triumphs through their daughter.
The True test of private school politics will be seen if some of the current players remain on blue over players who were new last night
I'm honestly confused about the private school politics comment. Seriously, how are you thinking private school politics would come into play here?
If there are so many changes to be made, then they did not pick the right girls last year. They picked on KJs and other private school coaches recommendations and not on skill.
Yeah why would they take girls that go to schools that let me check my notes....... All appeared in the NATIONAL TOP 25 rankings at some point this past season. Idiots, they obviously should pick players who won the prestigious Cedar Run District Championship. Absolute farce of a club...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SSSAS vs Oakton and Langley
33 Goals scored - 3 Goals Allowed
Battlefield vs Oakton and Langley
15 Goals scored - 14 Allowed
SSSAS 20026s were enjoying gatorade by the end of the 1st quarter in both games.
Langley beat BF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep. The Battlefield girls are better than any of the SSSAS, Visi and Potomac girls. You should have seen them at the tryouts. Blazing 300 times, unbreakable defense and unstoppable attack.
Oooh. Do tell!
So you were an evaluator?
Anonymous wrote:SSSAS vs Oakton and Langley
33 Goals scored - 3 Goals Allowed
Battlefield vs Oakton and Langley
15 Goals scored - 14 Allowed
SSSAS 20026s were enjoying gatorade by the end of the 1st quarter in both games.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep. The Battlefield girls are better than any of the SSSAS, Visi and Potomac girls. You should have seen them at the tryouts. Blazing 300 times, unbreakable defense and unstoppable attack.
Oooh. Do tell!
Anonymous wrote:SSSAS vs Oakton and Langley
33 Goals scored - 3 Goals Allowed
Battlefield vs Oakton and Langley
15 Goals scored - 14 Allowed
SSSAS 20026s were enjoying gatorade by the end of the 1st quarter in both games.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep. The Battlefield girls are better than any of the SSSAS, Visi and Potomac girls. You should have seen them at the tryouts. Blazing 300 times, unbreakable defense and unstoppable attack.
If your kid doesn’t make it, you are the reason. No coach wants parents like this. High school or college.
You people take the bait on this Battlefield trolling every time. Grow up. Not a single Battlefield parent I know talks this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep. The Battlefield girls are better than any of the SSSAS, Visi and Potomac girls. You should have seen them at the tryouts. Blazing 300 times, unbreakable defense and unstoppable attack.
If your kid doesn’t make it, you are the reason. No coach wants parents like this. High school or college.