Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My takeaway from this (among other things):

I’m going to make sure my kids understand that it’s not a crime for them to be recorded in public.

I think the woman genuinely believed that being recorded in public by a stranger is somehow in and of itself illegal or assault or something.

You can be recorded in public. You can record police. Govern yourself accordingly.

You tell your kids to run from a man like that. He had treats and was calling the dog over. If that was your kid with you and he did that to your kid, what would you think?

Its not ok to threaten someone by videoing them. She was in an area alone and her dog was was not bothering anyone. His bird watching story made no sense.

He's a board member of the NY Audobon Society, you dolt. She violated leash laws and placed a false 911 call, and you're defending her? So sick of all the racist Karens around here.

Who cares if he was a board member? He should have the common sense not to walk up to a woman, intimidate her and then try to steal her dog. If that were a child, it would be kidnapping. She may be racist, but he's a nut job and potential dog napper.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find the term Karen and Becky offensive. What if there was a Leroy or Tyrone? Just as offensive.

But Leroy and Tyrone don’t benefit from white privilege like Karen and Becky.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread needs to end. The racist women was filmed and rightfully outed. She was fired from her job, had to surrender her dog and hopefully will be charged with filing a false police report. Move on, people.

And what about the crazy man faking bird watching who set up the situation via his own version of what happened and was trying to take her dog. If this was a child it would be kidnapping. It was not a false police report as he was trying to take her dog by calling the dog over and offering it treats without her consent. Look at his actions. He should be fired. She was unhinged but she was provoked and he kept after her and most women along in a park would panic.

I am reporting you.

Reporting for what? Having a different opinion? They were both out of control. However, he provoked her. Look at the social media posting he posted about his actions. If she violated the law, he calls the police to enforce. He doesn't ask the dog to come to him and offer the dog treats. That looks like kidnapping.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread needs to end. The racist women was filmed and rightfully outed. She was fired from her job, had to surrender her dog and hopefully will be charged with filing a false police report. Move on, people.

And what about the crazy man faking bird watching who set up the situation via his own version of what happened and was trying to take her dog. If this was a child it would be kidnapping. It was not a false police report as he was trying to take her dog by calling the dog over and offering it treats without her consent. Look at his actions. He should be fired. She was unhinged but she was provoked and he kept after her and most women along in a park would panic.

I am reporting you.

Anonymous wrote:I find the term Karen and Becky offensive. What if there was a Leroy or Tyrone? Just as offensive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find the term Karen and Becky offensive. What if there was a Leroy or Tyrone? Just as offensive.

I do too.

Of course you do. Now tell us, how do you view Leroy or Tyrone? Why those particular names?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do people think its ok for the man to set up the situation and try to take her dog from her? If that was a child and he offered the child candy, would that be ok? By his account, he was setting up the situation, being a bully and who knows what he was trying to do by trying to take the dog from her with dog treats. If that was a child, we'd call him a potential kidnapper. He set it up completely and if you look at his words, something is seriously off about the man. He was not bird watching and clearly has done this before or was out to take someone's dog as who carries treats around if you don't have a dog.

Pretty sure if the dog were a kid she'd already be in jail for strangling it.

Try harder?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread needs to end. The racist women was filmed and rightfully outed. She was fired from her job, had to surrender her dog and hopefully will be charged with filing a false police report. Move on, people.

And what about the crazy man faking bird watching who set up the situation via his own version of what happened and was trying to take her dog. If this was a child it would be kidnapping. It was not a false police report as he was trying to take her dog by calling the dog over and offering it treats without her consent. Look at his actions. He should be fired. She was unhinged but she was provoked and he kept after her and most women along in a park would panic.

Ah yes, the Audubon board member, a well-known NYC birder, was probably faking bird watching and trying to steal random dogs. Very tricky!

You’re a troll at best and just dumb at worst. I’m sorry you’re stuck with being either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My takeaway from this (among other things):

I’m going to make sure my kids understand that it’s not a crime for them to be recorded in public.

I think the woman genuinely believed that being recorded in public by a stranger is somehow in and of itself illegal or assault or something.

You can be recorded in public. You can record police. Govern yourself accordingly.

You tell your kids to run from a man like that. He had treats and was calling the dog over. If that was your kid with you and he did that to your kid, what would you think?

Its not ok to threaten someone by videoing them. She was in an area alone and her dog was was not bothering anyone. His bird watching story made no sense.

He's a board member of the NY Audobon Society, you dolt. She violated leash laws and placed a false 911 call, and you're defending her? So sick of all the racist Karens around here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do people think its ok for the man to set up the situation and try to take her dog from her? If that was a child and he offered the child candy, would that be ok? By his account, he was setting up the situation, being a bully and who knows what he was trying to do by trying to take the dog from her with dog treats. If that was a child, we'd call him a potential kidnapper. He set it up completely and if you look at his words, something is seriously off about the man. He was not bird watching and clearly has done this before or was out to take someone's dog as who carries treats around if you don't have a dog.

Pretty sure if the dog were a kid she'd already be in jail for strangling it.

Try harder?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My takeaway from this (among other things):

I’m going to make sure my kids understand that it’s not a crime for them to be recorded in public.

I think the woman genuinely believed that being recorded in public by a stranger is somehow in and of itself illegal or assault or something.

You can be recorded in public. You can record police. Govern yourself accordingly.

You tell your kids to run from a man like that. He had treats and was calling the dog over. If that was your kid with you and he did that to your kid, what would you think?

Its not ok to threaten someone by videoing them. She was in an area alone and her dog was was not bothering anyone. His bird watching story made no sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find the term Karen and Becky offensive. What if there was a Leroy or Tyrone? Just as offensive.

I do too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find the term Karen and Becky offensive. What if there was a Leroy or Tyrone? Just as offensive.

I do too.