Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Do... do you think that Councilmembers should also be independent contractors?
Not PP, but I don't think they should be allowed to hold two jobs and draw two salaries, as Cheh and many other DC Council members do. This is not the norm in America. If Cheh had one job, she'd have more time to supervise.
She teaches the same Constitutional Law class that she has taught for 25 years. The syllabus likely hasn't changed in 20 years. And legally, the Council position is part time. So in reality, she isn't doing anything wrong and...yet she still has time to convene meetings on site at Hearst with DGS as she has throughout this process. I know, because I have been to a lot of them. Have you?
You are correct. She isn't doing anything wrong as the Council rules allow this. My understanding is this kind of double dipping is not typical in American civic affairs, and if the Council were not so self serving they would amend it. Any of your further justification is irrelevant. Are you a public servant? Yes? Then serve. Councilmembers draw a healthy salary
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Do... do you think that Councilmembers should also be independent contractors?
Not PP, but I don't think they should be allowed to hold two jobs and draw two salaries, as Cheh and many other DC Council members do. This is not the norm in America. If Cheh had one job, she'd have more time to supervise.
She teaches the same Constitutional Law class that she has taught for 25 years. The syllabus likely hasn't changed in 20 years. And legally, the Council position is part time. So in reality, she isn't doing anything wrong and...yet she still has time to convene meetings on site at Hearst with DGS as she has throughout this process. I know, because I have been to a lot of them. Have you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Do... do you think that Councilmembers should also be independent contractors?
Not PP, but I don't think they should be allowed to hold two jobs and draw two salaries, as Cheh and many other DC Council members do. This is not the norm in America. If Cheh had one job, she'd have more time to supervise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Do... do you think that Councilmembers should also be independent contractors?
Not PP, but I don't think they should be allowed to hold two jobs and draw two salaries, as Cheh and many other DC Council members do. This is not the norm in America. If Cheh had one job, she'd have more time to supervise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Do... do you think that Councilmembers should also be independent contractors?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why you all are scapegoating Mary Cheh, I don’t know. You live in a city with a long history of admin ineptitude, mismanagement and corruption. Did you think your neighborhood project would be exempt? Why? Because it’s lovely Cleveland Park? Your ire should be directed at DGS. This is their job. You just don’t like Cheh. Don’t vote for her. Campaign against her. Get a recall petition going.
And she’s responsible for oak mites? Really? You lose all credibility with that accusation.
I don’t like Mary Cheh and I’m posting here so that more people are aware of her role in the Hearst Park fiasco and maybe they won’t vote for her either.
Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Anonymous wrote:How can you not blame her - it was her idea and her failure to supervise her own project
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why you all are scapegoating Mary Cheh, I don’t know. You live in a city with a long history of admin ineptitude, mismanagement and corruption. Did you think your neighborhood project would be exempt? Why? Because it’s lovely Cleveland Park? Your ire should be directed at DGS. This is their job. You just don’t like Cheh. Don’t vote for her. Campaign against her. Get a recall petition going.
And she’s responsible for oak mites? Really? You lose all credibility with that accusation.
I don’t like Mary Cheh and I’m posting here so that more people are aware of her role in the Hearst Park fiasco and maybe they won’t vote for her either.
Anonymous wrote:Why you all are scapegoating Mary Cheh, I don’t know. You live in a city with a long history of admin ineptitude, mismanagement and corruption. Did you think your neighborhood project would be exempt? Why? Because it’s lovely Cleveland Park? Your ire should be directed at DGS. This is their job. You just don’t like Cheh. Don’t vote for her. Campaign against her. Get a recall petition going.
And she’s responsible for oak mites? Really? You lose all credibility with that accusation.
Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh should face her constituents in Cleveland Park and explain why she was right and they were wrong. It looks a lot like they were right and she was wrong right now. Everything they feared has come true so far. What is she going to do to make sure it doesn’t get worse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:denuding by taking out all of the 60 year weeds off the hills
Clear cutting the slopes, with no plan to reforest them, has only made a bad drainage problem worse. To be fair to Cheh, she’s neither a forester nor a hydrology engineer; she’s just a professor in a second or third rate DC law school.