Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't feed the trolls who insist on promoting the Trump-Russia collusion narrative DESPITE the fact that no American was indicted nor evidence found that would support this claim.

These trolls won't ever be convinced. They still cannot believe that SHE lost.

Flynn, Manafort and Stone, all indicted.

Not for Russian collusion—haw haw

And Capone was brought down for tax fraud

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2018/10/17/al-capone-sentenced-to-prison-for-tax-evasion-on-this-day-in-1931/#1db0b2c37c4c

Guess he wasn't a mobster

Liberal "logic" is beyond belief

Let's just agree that we both think the other side is stupid and ridiculous and probably also evil

It'll save your fingers having to type it out over and over

See, I didn't say that or even imply that, and I don't even think that.

But it's fascinating how you moved the argument from an actual argument (that logic you used was truly absurd, but perhaps you are a very smart person just having a bad day) to a general characterization of a group of people.

Must be a (quite unfortunate) habit of mind.

See, you're just wasting precious finger motions again trying to call me stupid without using the word stupid.

My new resolution is just to ignore the troll-y posters like you. Hopefully we can have some better engagement/conversations here if a number of us decide to stop falling for your bait.

Have a great weekend.

DP. You’re the one projecting, not the PP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why will Trump win?

After the performance yesterday by the liberals in California at the Democratic Convention, Trump may skate to an easy win.

The welcoming cheers 2020 presidential hopeful John Hickenlooper received when he first graced the stage at California's Democratic Convention quickly crumbled into boos and jeers after he rejected socialism as the answer to Democrats' problems.

"If we want to beat Donald Trump and achieve big progressive goals, socialism is not the answer," Hickenlooper said to a crowd of more than 4,500 delegates and observers on Saturday.
Before he could get finish his next sentence, a chorus of boos along with a sea of waving "Bernie" signs overtook his speech, lasting for more than 30 seconds. The moment prompted Hickenlooper to attempt a smile and eventually break from his remarks to add, "You know, if we're not careful, we're going to end up helping to re-elect the worst president in history."
The former Colorado governor is one of 15 Democratic candidates to address the San Francisco crowd, which is known to be home to some of the party's furthest left progressives.
The moment seemed to pass until Hickenlooper started to speak about "pragmatism."
"We shouldn't try to achieve universal coverage by removing private insurance from over 150 million Americans," he said to growing boos. "We should not try to tackle climate change by guaranteeing every American a government job."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/01/politics/john-hickenlooper-booed-socialism/index.html

Hilarious and sad. I actually feel for any mainstream Democratic candidate. They now have to contend with the radical leftists who refuse to listen to reason. What a bunch of twits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Come 2020, when Trump wins you can say that the Democratic nominee won the popular vote and 538 said that Trump had a __ % chance of winning the presidency and so the polls were all correct. And then we will expect the Democrats to rant about how we should select the president based on the popular vote and how the electoral college is a vestige of slavery, and on and on .........

And thereafter, you can argue that the Democratic nominee would have been the winner if only there were no voter suppression, foreign intervention in the election, etc etc.

Nothing will change ............ Democrats will keep whining and complain about how unfair the system is and how only the illiterate and dumb people vote for Trump.

For a party that has won the popular vote just once in over 30 years, you do sound very cocky and delusional. The conman won simply because Comey reopened the email issue 10 days before the election. He was selected by the EC after winning 3 states by 75K votes. In 2018 dem wave the mid west states came back to the dem fold PLUS AZ is now a purple state. GA, TX are heading towards being purple state.

All he could do in 4 years is tax cuts for the rich and harassment of the refugees. Nothing else. One of the worst president in American history.

Listen up cultist: progressives set the trend for this country. Obamacare is the law and it couldn’t be revoked and next stop is universal healthcare. Taxes are going up on the rich again. Comprehensive immigration is happening sooner or later. Justice reform is happening so all people of all color get the same punishment for the same crime. No more cases of whites walking away with minor time done while blacks languish for life. The country is already minority majority when you count only millennials and GenZ. That’s awesome news because racists will slowly go out of business and learn to respect all people.

It's funny how you keep regurgitating the same words, over and over and over... so unoriginal. Every one of your posts is exactly alike. You did forget to mention "the Australian channel" and "liar-in-chief". No matter - I'm sure you'll work them into your next post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Interesting then that so many of you were shocked - SHOCKED!! - when he wound up winning. I guess you didn't take into account the EC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't feed the trolls who insist on promoting the Trump-Russia collusion narrative DESPITE the fact that no American was indicted nor evidence found that would support this claim.

These trolls won't ever be convinced. They still cannot believe that SHE lost.

Flynn, Manafort and Stone, all indicted.

Not for Russian collusion—haw haw

Guys, time to ramp up Kilimnik and FB posts. And about time to hack Sleepy Joe’s emails. Russia if you are listening please find Sleepy Joe emails.

Why do you keep trolling using exactly the same words? Do you think you're clever?

That’s not trolling Sucker! That’s what Our plan is, just ask Putin, or Trump.

Weird, weird person. Surely there's a bridge somewhere that would take you back?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't feed the trolls who insist on promoting the Trump-Russia collusion narrative DESPITE the fact that no American was indicted nor evidence found that would support this claim.

These trolls won't ever be convinced. They still cannot believe that SHE lost.

Flynn, Manafort and Stone, all indicted.

Not for Russian collusion—haw haw

Guys, time to ramp up Kilimnik and FB posts. And about time to hack Sleepy Joe’s emails. Russia if you are listening please find Sleepy Joe emails.

Why do you keep trolling using exactly the same words? Do you think you're clever?

That’s not trolling Sucker! That’s what Our plan is, just ask Putin, or Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Come 2020, when Trump wins you can say that the Democratic nominee won the popular vote and 538 said that Trump had a __ % chance of winning the presidency and so the polls were all correct. And then we will expect the Democrats to rant about how we should select the president based on the popular vote and how the electoral college is a vestige of slavery, and on and on .........

And thereafter, you can argue that the Democratic nominee would have been the winner if only there were no voter suppression, foreign intervention in the election, etc etc.

Nothing will change ............ Democrats will keep whining and complain about how unfair the system is and how only the illiterate and dumb people vote for Trump.

For a party that has won the popular vote just once in over 30 years, you do sound very cocky and delusional. The conman won simply because Comey reopened the email issue 10 days before the election. He was selected by the EC after winning 3 states by 75K votes. In 2018 dem wave the mid west states came back to the dem fold PLUS AZ is now a purple state. GA, TX are heading towards being purple state.

All he could do in 4 years is tax cuts for the rich and harassment of the refugees. Nothing else. One of the worst president in American history.

Listen up cultist: progressives set the trend for this country. Obamacare is the law and it couldn’t be revoked and next stop is universal healthcare. Taxes are going up on the rich again. Comprehensive immigration is happening sooner or later. Justice reform is happening so all people of all color get the same punishment for the same crime. No more cases of whites walking away with minor time done while blacks languish for life. The country is already minority majority when you count only millennials and GenZ. That’s awesome news because racists will slowly go out of business and learn to respect all people.

Anonymous wrote:It’s Hilarious and sad what the GOP has become. I actually feel for any mainstream Republican candidate post Liar. They now have to contend with the radical rightists who refuse to listen to reason. What a bunch of twits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Come 2020, when Trump wins you can say that the Democratic nominee won the popular vote and 538 said that Trump had a __ % chance of winning the presidency and so the polls were all correct. And then we will expect the Democrats to rant about how we should select the president based on the popular vote and how the electoral college is a vestige of slavery, and on and on .........

And thereafter, you can argue that the Democratic nominee would have been the winner if only there were no voter suppression, foreign intervention in the election, etc etc.

Nothing will change ............ Democrats will keep whining and complain about how unfair the system is and how only the illiterate and dumb people vote for Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump will win again in 2020 because the average voter is wise and knows that the Party of Delusion, Division and Insults needs to spend at least four years more disinfecting itself.

You only need to read this thread to see how the crazies have taken over what once was a serious governing party.

Trump will lose in 2020 because the average voter is wise and knows that the Party of Delusion, Division and Insults needs to spend at least four years disinfecting itself.

You only need to read this thread to see how the crazies have taken over what once was a serious governing party.

Let people decide

Now, do you commit to respecting the outcome, whatever it is, or will you continue generating hate and conspiracy theories?

If the nutter on this thread is any indication, there’s no way in hell they will respect the outcome - unless their candidate wins, however. Exactly how spoiled brats behave.

Didn’t the spoiled tantrum thrower say he may not accept the result if he lost because it is all loaded against him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't feed the trolls who insist on promoting the Trump-Russia collusion narrative DESPITE the fact that no American was indicted nor evidence found that would support this claim.

These trolls won't ever be convinced. They still cannot believe that SHE lost.

Flynn, Manafort and Stone, all indicted.

Not for Russian collusion—haw haw

Guys, time to ramp up Kilimnik and FB posts. And about time to hack Sleepy Joe’s emails. Russia if you are listening please find Sleepy Joe emails.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the teal line goes UP, the MAGA optimism goes DOWN.

Hey Boomers?

Is optimism still high if you think millennials are going to come out and vote in record numbers?

I’m Gen X and couldn’t care less what millennials do or don’t do. They are the laughingstock of the nation.

I'm surprised to say this about a Trump supporter - but I think you missed the point

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are many Trump voters who have had it. This person below says Helsinki was his last straw when Trump was obsequious to Putin and said he believed in Putin but not Americans. Atleast this guy is honest about his mistake and earned my respect.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/06/02/ohio-democrat-trump-voter-van-jones-vjs-vpx.cnn

This is about the 4th time I have seen this article linked here.
It makes me chuckle, actually. You were able to find this one voter who was willing to go on CNN and express his opinion.

When was the last time CNN had voters on who DIDN'T vote for Trump last election but vow to in 2020? (rhetorical question - we know the answer)

When Cult 45 believes he will win without any data to backup that is delusional. But go ahead and continue your delusions.

Wait - didn’t you say *exactly* that in 2016??
-DP

The data was correct, he lost by 3 million and he always had 30% chance as per 538 stat analysis. That is much better odds than most sports game winning odds between a top team and an avg one

Come 2020, when Trump wins you can say that the Democratic nominee won the popular vote and 538 said that Trump had a __ % chance of winning the presidency and so the polls were all correct. And then we will expect the Democrats to rant about how we should select the president based on the popular vote and how the electoral college is a vestige of slavery, and on and on .........

And thereafter, you can argue that the Democratic nominee would have been the winner if only there were no voter suppression, foreign intervention in the election, etc etc.

Nothing will change ............ Democrats will keep whining and complain about how unfair the system is and how only the illiterate and dumb people vote for Trump.