SpiritVAParent wrote:I thought I would follow RSD’s example and own my posts here. I watched my DD’s 04 game against FCV this afternoon. They lost, not a surprise, but not by as much as before. 3-0, and one of the goals was unlucky because the FCV player kicked it out of the keeper’s hands after a save. It looks to me like the defense is working well, the midfield is shaky, and the forwards are not effective. My DD tells me the coaching has been focused on the back and is moving forward. They’ll still contend for last place in the division, but the team is improving and holding their own agains a very talented FCV team. I’d like to see them play Mclean or BRYC or another ECNL team in a scrimmage.
Anonymous wrote:A general observation, some people in this thread have a real issue with a difference of opinion. Rather than acknowledging it and moving on, they’d rather get the last word in and disregard the opposing view, no matter the specific subject. This happens over and over again, but unfortunately, making the last post doesn’t “win” the argument for you.
Anonymous wrote:And like I said, it might be and it might not. I have seen plenty of below age players who can outplay kids in the next higher age group. Given the choice, I’d prefer the younger player. The ones who become angriest about that are the parents of kids in the older age group. That’s life.
It’s ok, we can agree to disagree. There’s no right or wrong answer here, just opinions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check the game reports. Arlington took play-ups over 06s that left.
Ahh, fits with what I was saying: play ups are a sign of problems filling out rosters. But that's just one age group, so it may normalize after this year. We'll see...
Anonymous wrote:Check the game reports. Arlington took play-ups over 06s that left.