Lol - y'all just love locking up black folks don't you?
Say, I heard their great aunt is 92 years old and there's an audio recording going around of her saying it Walter Scott would be alive today if he was white - y'all wanna lock her up too?

And the daughter's video with incredibly graphic language..saying her father was killed because he's black. No, there was probable cause that he was committing a felony, he did not follow police commands, and he was shot because he was presenting an immediate threat.

I think the wife should go to jail. It's like yelling fire in a crowded place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New info..

1. The gun recovered was a stolen gun..it was stolen in a burglary and the burglar admitted to selling it to Scott.
2. Mr.Scott's wife took out a protective order against him last year..and on the application she wrote that he carries a gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3808803/amp/Keith-Scott-carrying-stolen-gun-police-say-wife-filed-restraining-order-against-saying-armed-violent-threatened-kill-her.html?client=safari

- which makes her a liar deserving no credibility whatsoever.

Yet again, the police have been telling the truth all along but the rioters chose to follow liars without checking a single fact first.

+1

"It was a book"..no it was a STOLEN GUN in the possession of a felon

And STILL Hillary is using this to blame police. She really needs to rile up blacks to come out to vote. Only way to do that is to blame the "man." She's disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New info..

1. The gun recovered was a stolen gun..it was stolen in a burglary and the burglar admitted to selling it to Scott.
2. Mr.Scott's wife took out a protective order against him last year..and on the application she wrote that he carries a gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3808803/amp/Keith-Scott-carrying-stolen-gun-police-say-wife-filed-restraining-order-against-saying-armed-violent-threatened-kill-her.html?client=safari

- which makes her a liar deserving no credibility whatsoever.

Yet again, the police have been telling the truth all along but the rioters chose to follow liars without checking a single fact first.

+1

"It was a book"..no it was a STOLEN GUN in the possession of a felon

Anonymous wrote:New info..

1. The gun recovered was a stolen gun..it was stolen in a burglary and the burglar admitted to selling it to Scott.
2. Mr.Scott's wife took out a protective order against him last year..and on the application she wrote that he carries a gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3808803/amp/Keith-Scott-carrying-stolen-gun-police-say-wife-filed-restraining-order-against-saying-armed-violent-threatened-kill-her.html?client=safari

- which makes her a liar deserving no credibility whatsoever.

Yet again, the police have been telling the truth all along but the rioters chose to follow liars without checking a single fact first.

^ not sure if that link is working but here are others:

http://abc11.com/news/man-shot-by-charlotte-police-was-sold-stolen-gun-authorities-say/1527591/

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jenna_Barnes/status/780508828894892032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Anonymous wrote:New info..

1. The gun recovered was a stolen gun..it was stolen in a burglary and the burglar admitted to selling it to Scott.
2. Mr.Scott's wife took out a protective order against him last year..and on the application she wrote that he carries a gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3808803/amp/Keith-Scott-carrying-stolen-gun-police-say-wife-filed-restraining-order-against-saying-armed-violent-threatened-kill-her.html?client=safari

Yeah, and somehow it's still the police officers' fault.

New info..

1. The gun recovered was a stolen gun..it was stolen in a burglary and the burglar admitted to selling it to Scott.
2. Mr.Scott's wife took out a protective order against him last year..and on the application she wrote that he carries a gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3808803/amp/Keith-Scott-carrying-stolen-gun-police-say-wife-filed-restraining-order-against-saying-armed-violent-threatened-kill-her.html?client=safari

Anonymous wrote:Despite the wife's claim that her husband was holding a book, multiple media sources report no book was found at all at the scene. Only marihuana, an ankle holster, and a loaded gun with his prints all over it were found.

And the wife also claims she wasn't aware he even owned a gun at all - even though he had it strapped right to his ankle that day.

It's almost like she's completely lying about the whole thing.

Has the family said anything since the police released their videos/photos of the gun?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You call the protesters how you see em I call posters how I see em - yin and yang. I suspect you'll live in spite of the insult and I suspect the city of Charlotte will recover. This ain't the 1st riot in American history and I suspect it won't be the last so chill.

I suggest you take your own advice and unclench.

Okay so you got suggestions and I do too - don't look like anybody's gonna take heed to any advice so fcuk it. I can run my yap too but trust me I'm smiling.
Laughing actually.

Anonymous wrote:You call the protesters how you see em I call posters how I see em - yin and yang. I suspect you'll live in spite of the insult and I suspect the city of Charlotte will recover. This ain't the 1st riot in American history and I suspect it won't be the last so chill.

I suggest you take your own advice and unclench.

You call the protesters how you see em I call posters how I see em - yin and yang. I suspect you'll live in spite of the insult and I suspect the city of Charlotte will recover. This ain't the 1st riot in American history and I suspect it won't be the last so chill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now some of the "activists" in Charlotte are calling for the police chief to step down. For what? Among their other complaints, they are objecting to the police "stifling" (their word) the rioters. So in other words, they want free reign to destroy property, loot businesses, assault people, and commit whatever other violent crimes without the police trying to maintain control? These people are ridiculous.

Their city their business their right.
Least they got the balls to do more than bitch.
Can't tell you how many times in this forum I've seen people yapping non-stop about much they hate Lanier and Bowser but outside of social media they don't say/do shit.

IT IS NOT THEIR CITY!!!!

70% of them are not even from that state at all. Go read the link at the thread "traveling side show."

ITS NEVER A RIGHT TO DESTROY OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY!!!!

What does it even accomplish anyway?

Finally - what is wrong with you?

It's their city if they take it over - i.e. this whole damn country is ours cause we took it over.
Nothing wrong with me I'm not the one butthurt over some shit happening 400 miles away.

First, there is more than one poster responding to your insanity.and irresponsibility.
And second, NO....it is not their city. They don't get to "take it over" bcsuse they feel like it. Maybe you haven't heard, but we are a nation of laws, not barbarians, and you don't get to violate other people's property and person just because you're PO'd about something. And the country is YOURS? WTH? You're crazy.
And third, stop crying about racism. Your attitude toward violent criminal behavior is perpetuating it.

Despite the wife's claim that her husband was holding a book, multiple media sources report no book was found at all at the scene. Only marihuana, an ankle holster, and a loaded gun with his prints all over it were found.

And the wife also claims she wasn't aware he even owned a gun at all - even though he had it strapped right to his ankle that day.

It's almost like she's completely lying about the whole thing.