Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:34
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
It's well known that New York State had a botched rollout, and that's a state implementation issue. It doesn't necessarily indicate anything about anywhere else.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:32
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
http://ny.chalkbeat.org/topics/common-core/
Tests in NY plunged to about 30% pass rate. I'm not the poster who said the standards were geared to the top 30 %--but that kind of justifies the statement.
Tests in NY plunged to about 30% pass rate. I'm not the poster who said the standards were geared to the top 30 %--but that kind of justifies the statement.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:30
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Where is this supposed evidence?
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:29
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Why would anybody left a finger for you?
You dodge and dart from all the actual evidence put before you. Meanwhile, you offer zero proof that this is doing anything positive for our kids.
NON-RESPONSIVE, you fail.
Try again:
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Already been provided, hysterical one.
If that is true, then you should be able to provide a link to it. If you can't, then your claim is suspect.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:28
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was developed by private testing companies paid for by a consortium of states[b]COMMON CORE is a minimum standard. set of standards
It is NOT a curriculum. No, but it drives curriculum because it is tested by the standardized tests
It is NOT a test. But if a state has adopted Common Core, they must use tests aligned to it---so far there are two of those that are approved for use by the feds
It is NOT federally developed. It was state-led, and state-developed. Feds only provided financial assistance. If you call a committee selected by a trade association "state-led" and "state developed" well, okay, but it's a pretty fast and loose definition of those terms
The TEST is mandated by NCLB, which is federal law. yes, and this is the reason it drives curriculum and why publishers are jumping in to provide that curriculum
The test is aligned to Common Core, because whatever the state standard is in place what you align it to. Yes, because NCLB mandates testing[b]
But the TEST is also not federally developed. It was developed by a consortium of STATES.
And your house was built by contractors. By your logic above, it's not your house, it's their house.
Sorry, try again - that argument does not work.
Then why is PARCC the one monitoring students and parents on social media.
I love the depths of your delusions.
Logic is deeply lacking in you. The test is not for the benefit of the testing company, it is for the benefit of the states, however the testing companies do have a vested interest in looking out for the best interests of the states to mitigate and minimize breaches of the test - which in fact KEEPS COSTS DOWN.
You really don't understand how ANYTHING works, do you? And then, you ridiculously want to presume to proclaim those things that you clearly do not understand as "delusional?" Laughable.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:25
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Why would anybody left a finger for you?
You dodge and dart from all the actual evidence put before you. Meanwhile, you offer zero proof that this is doing anything positive for our kids.
NON-RESPONSIVE, you fail.
Try again:
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Already been provided, hysterical one.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:25
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
And your house was built by contractors. By your logic above, it's not your house, it's their house.
Sorry, try again - that argument does not work.
Neither does your analogy. Is your house paid off? The feds are the mortgage company with your analogy.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:24
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was developed by private testing companies paid for by a consortium of states[b]COMMON CORE is a minimum standard. set of standards
It is NOT a curriculum. No, but it drives curriculum because it is tested by the standardized tests
It is NOT a test. But if a state has adopted Common Core, they must use tests aligned to it---so far there are two of those that are approved for use by the feds
It is NOT federally developed. It was state-led, and state-developed. Feds only provided financial assistance. If you call a committee selected by a trade association "state-led" and "state developed" well, okay, but it's a pretty fast and loose definition of those terms
The TEST is mandated by NCLB, which is federal law. yes, and this is the reason it drives curriculum and why publishers are jumping in to provide that curriculum
The test is aligned to Common Core, because whatever the state standard is in place what you align it to. Yes, because NCLB mandates testing[b]
But the TEST is also not federally developed. It was developed by a consortium of STATES.
And your house was built by contractors. By your logic above, it's not your house, it's their house.
Sorry, try again - that argument does not work.
Then why is PARCC the one monitoring students and parents on social media.
I love the depths of your delusions.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:24
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Why would anybody left a finger for you?
You dodge and dart from all the actual evidence put before you. Meanwhile, you offer zero proof that this is doing anything positive for our kids.
NON-RESPONSIVE, you fail.
Try again:
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:23
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Why would anybody left a finger for you?
You dodge and dart from all the actual evidence put before you. Meanwhile, you offer zero proof that this is doing anything positive for our kids.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:22
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:It was developed by private testing companies paid for by a consortium of states[b]COMMON CORE is a minimum standard. set of standards
It is NOT a curriculum. No, but it drives curriculum because it is tested by the standardized tests
It is NOT a test. But if a state has adopted Common Core, they must use tests aligned to it---so far there are two of those that are approved for use by the feds
It is NOT federally developed. It was state-led, and state-developed. Feds only provided financial assistance. If you call a committee selected by a trade association "state-led" and "state developed" well, okay, but it's a pretty fast and loose definition of those terms
The TEST is mandated by NCLB, which is federal law. yes, and this is the reason it drives curriculum and why publishers are jumping in to provide that curriculum
The test is aligned to Common Core, because whatever the state standard is in place what you align it to. Yes, because NCLB mandates testing[b]
But the TEST is also not federally developed. It was developed by a consortium of STATES.
And your house was built by contractors. By your logic above, it's not your house, it's their house.
Sorry, try again - that argument does not work.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:21
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Where is your documentation of the criteria used to assess Common Core standards to determine that they are developmentally inappropriate? Where is your data to support your made-up claims about Common Core only being appropriate for the "top 30%?"
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
WHERE IS THE DATA? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? PROVIDE CITATIONS!
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:19
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
It was developed by private testing companies paid for by a consortium of states[b]COMMON CORE is a minimum standard. set of standards
It is NOT a curriculum. No, but it drives curriculum because it is tested by the standardized tests
It is NOT a test. But if a state has adopted Common Core, they must use tests aligned to it---so far there are two of those that are approved for use by the feds
It is NOT federally developed. It was state-led, and state-developed. Feds only provided financial assistance. If you call a committee selected by a trade association "state-led" and "state developed" well, okay, but it's a pretty fast and loose definition of those terms
The TEST is mandated by NCLB, which is federal law. yes, and this is the reason it drives curriculum and why publishers are jumping in to provide that curriculum
The test is aligned to Common Core, because whatever the state standard is in place what you align it to. Yes, because NCLB mandates testing[b]
But the TEST is also not federally developed. It was developed by a consortium of STATES.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:19
Subject: Re:PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:
Over a hundred pages of repeated demands has not produced one iota of evidence to support that claim.
NO EVIDENCE.
Plenty. You just are so tied to supporting Common Core that it is pathetic. Ever heard of James Jones?
That is a lie.
Over a hundred pages of discussion here on Common Core and you have consistently failed to deliver.
Anonymous
03/28/2015 19:18
Subject: PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:COMMON CORE is a minimum standard.
It is NOT a curriculum.
It is NOT a test.
It is NOT federally developed. It was state-led, and state-developed. Feds only provided financial assistance.
The TEST is mandated by NCLB, which is federal law.
The test is aligned to Common Core, because whatever the state standard is in place what you align it to.
But the TEST is also not federally developed. It was developed by a consortium of STATES.
GET IT STRAIGHT AND STOP BEING SUCH AN OBTUSE JACKASS WHO KEEPS TWISTING THE FACTS.
OKAY, "HONEY?"
You are very naive if you believe this. The feds pulled every string to shove this "state-led" initiative down our throats. And "state-led" is largely driven by Chamber of Commerce types who want non-thinking employees who don't challenge their bullshit. You are the perfect Common Core mouthpiece.
The rest of us has looked deeper, and are calling them out and taking them down.
Oh, sure, you've looked deeper and discovered the existence of the Sasquatch, and discovered that he's flying the planes spraying the Chemtrails
