Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.
Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Being armed is not a crime, and certainly not justification for summary execution.
Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun.
So what?
The ICE shooters are the suspects here, you moron/troll/bot. No self-respecting American would condone this.
The PP was saying "so what?" to the preceding comment: "Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun."
It's funny the people who fight to open carry AR 15s at Tavo Bell are trying to argue it's okay to murder a guy for a holstered handgun that he never touched and had been taken before the shooting.
One thing's for sure--he certainly wasn't walking around like this:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Being armed is not a crime, and certainly not justification for summary execution.
Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun.
So what?
The ICE shooters are the suspects here, you moron/troll/bot. No self-respecting American would condone this.
The PP was saying "so what?" to the preceding comment: "Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun."
It's funny the people who fight to open carry AR 15s at Tavo Bell are trying to argue it's okay to murder a guy for a holstered handgun that he never touched and had been taken before the shooting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes I feel like I am living in the twilight zone. I thought small federal govt and second amendment were core conservative values. And then trump came along and flipped it all upside down. Using the federal govt to reach and control everything. And now using gun ownership to justify murder by federal agents. WTF is going on? I am hearing more democrats now mention supporting small govt and gun ownership. Are Republicans replaying 4D chess?
Trump isn’t a real conservative. I think we might be seeing some severe party shifts similar to the southern strategy. We indeed are living in upside down land.
A few conservatives are certainly starting to question things.
Brandish?
Our government LIES.
Anonymous wrote:
[twitter]Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning[/twitter]
He was filming at a distance and stepped into the street to help a woman that was being attacked by ICE. He was NOT protesting with a gun. He looked nothing like this MAGA hero: