Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
I was characterizing where CISC stood in ECNL MA before moving to GA. But yes, this is a board that mostly discusses “pay to play” youth soccer.
If it weren’t “pay to play” then would you be comfortable discussing CISC GA success? Do you only talk MLS Academy soccer? Not MLSNext “pay to play” but MLS Academy.
No I still wouldn’t be discussing CISC GA success because it’s kids soccer. It’s weird to discuss kids sports as if they were professionals. Kids sports are an enrichment activity we pay to enroll our kids and keep them busy. Like piano lessons and SAT prep. Imagine if we talked about different SAT prep businesses like we do soccer clubs, which ones had the best college acceptances because they developed those kids, made a big deal when a kid switched from one SAT prep business to another, called another SAT prep business trash because they were only interested in profits. Sounds silly doesn’t it?
This forum exists to talk about youth soccer. You don’t have to be here. Did you type that or dictate it to the nanny?
There are still plenty of useful things that could and are discussed here. Age group changes, recommendations, tournament info. Genuine helpful stuff. I want more of that and less trash talk and silly stuff. It would make this place a lot better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
I was characterizing where CISC stood in ECNL MA before moving to GA. But yes, this is a board that mostly discusses “pay to play” youth soccer.
If it weren’t “pay to play” then would you be comfortable discussing CISC GA success? Do you only talk MLS Academy soccer? Not MLSNext “pay to play” but MLS Academy.
No I still wouldn’t be discussing CISC GA success because it’s kids soccer. It’s weird to discuss kids sports as if they were professionals. Kids sports are an enrichment activity we pay to enroll our kids and keep them busy. Like piano lessons and SAT prep. Imagine if we talked about different SAT prep businesses like we do soccer clubs, which ones had the best college acceptances because they developed those kids, made a big deal when a kid switched from one SAT prep business to another, called another SAT prep business trash because they were only interested in profits. Sounds silly doesn’t it?
This forum exists to talk about youth soccer. You don’t have to be here. Did you type that or dictate it to the nanny?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
I was characterizing where CISC stood in ECNL MA before moving to GA. But yes, this is a board that mostly discusses “pay to play” youth soccer.
If it weren’t “pay to play” then would you be comfortable discussing CISC GA success? Do you only talk MLS Academy soccer? Not MLSNext “pay to play” but MLS Academy.
No I still wouldn’t be discussing CISC GA success because it’s kids soccer. It’s weird to discuss kids sports as if they were professionals. Kids sports are an enrichment activity we pay to enroll our kids and keep them busy. Like piano lessons and SAT prep. Imagine if we talked about different SAT prep businesses like we do soccer clubs, which ones had the best college acceptances because they developed those kids, made a big deal when a kid switched from one SAT prep business to another, called another SAT prep business trash because they were only interested in profits. Sounds silly doesn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
I was characterizing where CISC stood in ECNL MA before moving to GA. But yes, this is a board that mostly discusses “pay to play” youth soccer.
If it weren’t “pay to play” then would you be comfortable discussing CISC GA success? Do you only talk MLS Academy soccer? Not MLSNext “pay to play” but MLS Academy.
No I still wouldn’t be discussing CISC GA success because it’s kids soccer. It’s weird to discuss kids sports as if they were professionals. Kids sports are an enrichment activity we pay to enroll our kids and keep them busy. Like piano lessons and SAT prep. Imagine if we talked about different SAT prep businesses like we do soccer clubs, which ones had the best college acceptances because they developed those kids, made a big deal when a kid switched from one SAT prep business to another, called another SAT prep business trash because they were only interested in profits. Sounds silly doesn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
I was characterizing where CISC stood in ECNL MA before moving to GA. But yes, this is a board that mostly discusses “pay to play” youth soccer.
If it weren’t “pay to play” then would you be comfortable discussing CISC GA success? Do you only talk MLS Academy soccer? Not MLSNext “pay to play” but MLS Academy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Are you debating about how to characterize a pay to play youth soccer conference? What is the point y’all trying to make? Someday you will realize just how meaningless this stuff really is. Vibes of middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Very generous. “Bottom of the heap” is more accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Middle of the road? That is generous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did revolution SC make it to champions cup finals in NorCal? The only MA team.
Champions Cup is GA does not mean the same as Champions League (playoffs) in ECNL. GA Champions Cup are the best performing *clubs* from the previous season. Basically the club with the most teams finishing in top 5 in their conference the prior season.
By the way, there is a clear advantage in GA if your team plays in Champions Cup because you get to showcase at the best attended events. Even if the team isn’t good as long as the club is good you will be better off.
Rev should enjoy this year then…ain’t making it back there for a while…
This is where it stands right now for next year’s champions cup clubs. Top two clubs will represent mid atlantic south
Charlotte Independence - 19pts
VRSC and SYC - 12 pts
McLean - 10 pts
NVA and Charlotte Dev Academy - 9 pts
Wake FC - 8 pts
Triangle United - 4 pts
Alexandria - 3 pts
Likely Charlotte Independence and either VRSC/SYC/McLean
Funny how VRSC is actually NOT in any position to shut people up despite all that hype
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did revolution SC make it to champions cup finals in NorCal? The only MA team.
Champions Cup is GA does not mean the same as Champions League (playoffs) in ECNL. GA Champions Cup are the best performing *clubs* from the previous season. Basically the club with the most teams finishing in top 5 in their conference the prior season.
By the way, there is a clear advantage in GA if your team plays in Champions Cup because you get to showcase at the best attended events. Even if the team isn’t good as long as the club is good you will be better off.
Rev should enjoy this year then…ain’t making it back there for a while…
This is where it stands right now for next year’s champions cup clubs. Top two clubs will represent mid atlantic south
Charlotte Independence - 19pts
VRSC and SYC - 12 pts
McLean - 10 pts
NVA and Charlotte Dev Academy - 9 pts
Wake FC - 8 pts
Triangle United - 4 pts
Alexandria - 3 pts
Likely Charlotte Independence and either VRSC/SYC/McLean
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did revolution SC make it to champions cup finals in NorCal? The only MA team.
Champions Cup is GA does not mean the same as Champions League (playoffs) in ECNL. GA Champions Cup are the best performing *clubs* from the previous season. Basically the club with the most teams finishing in top 5 in their conference the prior season.
By the way, there is a clear advantage in GA if your team plays in Champions Cup because you get to showcase at the best attended events. Even if the team isn’t good as long as the club is good you will be better off.
Rev should enjoy this year then…ain’t making it back there for a while…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NORTH
My Bad, I missed that part.
Mid Atlantic South not so hot.
Anonymous wrote:NORTH