Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have had some create a distraction so others could get past and get in there.
I believe one of the moms who was initially held down was able to jump a fence and get her kids out.
Anonymous wrote:I would have had some create a distraction so others could get past and get in there.
uh-huhAnonymous wrote:I would have had some create a distraction so others could get past and get in there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
... The police on the scene put a mother in handcuffs as she begged them to go in and save her children. They blocked parents trying to organize to charge in to stop the shooter, including a father who learned his daughter was murdered while he argued with the cops...
These cops need to be prosecuted. What a pack of incompetent clowns.
Anonymous wrote:These cops are profoundly incompetent. From chasing him into the school, to standing around as children died. Worthless. They never thought they’d actually have to do anything, did they? They dressed up in their tough guy outfits every day and cashed their paychecks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like there is only one solution: let teachers and administrators pack heat.
It wouldn’t have helped in this case. The shooter had the element of surprise - he was at the door when the teacher went to lock it and then he shot out the window in the door. When would the teacher have had time to retrieve a firearm? She was dead within a second or two.
Stop it with these dumb fantasies. The gunmen always have the advantage of surprise. Look at the Navy Yard massacre - the gunmen killed the two armed guards at the gatehouse.
Video shows he went into the main school building through a propped open door. In this case, he was already shooting across the street so there was no element of surprise. She had time to get her phone. No criticism of her, just correcting your post re: timeline.
You're both right and wrong. I believe they were two different incidents since both were talked about in the same briefing.
It’s all very confusing. Why was the door propped open?
Anonymous wrote:Are we seriously going to argue about an open propped door??? What was stopping him from shooting the door down? That’s what he did to the classroom door. Stop making lame excuses and wondering if the open door is what caused this massacre. It was the assault weapon! It’s always the assault weapon!
Anonymous wrote:
... The police on the scene put a mother in handcuffs as she begged them to go in and save her children. They blocked parents trying to organize to charge in to stop the shooter, including a father who learned his daughter was murdered while he argued with the cops...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like there is only one solution: let teachers and administrators pack heat.
It wouldn’t have helped in this case. The shooter had the element of surprise - he was at the door when the teacher went to lock it and then he shot out the window in the door. When would the teacher have had time to retrieve a firearm? She was dead within a second or two.
Stop it with these dumb fantasies. The gunmen always have the advantage of surprise. Look at the Navy Yard massacre - the gunmen killed the two armed guards at the gatehouse.
Video shows he went into the main school building through a propped open door. In this case, he was already shooting across the street so there was no element of surprise. She had time to get her phone. No criticism of her, just correcting your post re: timeline.
You're both right and wrong. I believe they were two different incidents since both were talked about in the same briefing.
It’s all very confusing. Why was the door propped open?