Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, you all, what about the trope that Putin promotes? The USSR agreed to end the Cold War and NATO agreed not to expand its sphere of influence and countries?
What is that about? Is that what really happened in the 80s?
Yes
Jim baker promised it
I wonder why people don’t talk about jim baker more.
I mean I know why but we can’t talk about that here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:French president Macron is going to talk to Putin tomorrow again. Putin’s ex-wife lives in France:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4390088/Putin-s-ex-wife-owns-6million-Art-Deco-villa-France.html
Can they deport her to Siberia?
I imagine marriage to that sociopath was punishment enough, to be honest.
But if France supports Ukraine as they say they do, why do they tolerate that she and at least one of Putin’s daughters live in France on the money they didn’t earn? France should send them back, to defend Russia from Ukrainian invasion (people in Russia were brainwashed into believing that Ukraine plans to invade them, upon the US order).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:French president Macron is going to talk to Putin tomorrow again. Putin’s ex-wife lives in France:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4390088/Putin-s-ex-wife-owns-6million-Art-Deco-villa-France.html
Can they deport her to Siberia?
I imagine marriage to that sociopath was punishment enough, to be honest.
Anonymous wrote:French president Macron is going to talk to Putin tomorrow again. Putin’s ex-wife lives in France:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4390088/Putin-s-ex-wife-owns-6million-Art-Deco-villa-France.html
Can they deport her to Siberia?
It’s a great suggestion in the tweet above. All the Russian oligarchs, propagandists, and Kremlin decision-makers have property, bank accounts, investments overseas - in the UK, US, Italy, France, etc. If they and their families could be denied entry to these countries and their properties could be expropriated and sold with proceeds going to Ukraine and their money assets could be transferred to Ukraine, that would have made a real difference. Maybe then they would stop saying how they “poop on western sanctions” - as they do now.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I still can't believe this is happening. I can't believe we're just going to let them invade and not do anything beyond sanctions and sending supplies.
And what do you want us to do? Fight against Russia? Start World War III? Everyone loses under that scenario. Frankly, Ukraine isn't worth it.
This. And seriously helping to arm Ukraine. If this was done back in 2014, we wouldn’t be where we are now. But now is better than 8 years down the road again:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, you all, what about the trope that Putin promotes? The USSR agreed to end the Cold War and NATO agreed not to expand its sphere of influence and countries?
What is that about? Is that what really happened in the 80s?
Yes
Jim baker promised it
I wonder why people don’t talk about jim baker more.
I mean I know why but we can’t talk about that here
Anonymous wrote:Ok, you all, what about the trope that Putin promotes? The USSR agreed to end the Cold War and NATO agreed not to expand its sphere of influence and countries?
What is that about? Is that what really happened in the 80s?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to say that Ukraine is far from innocent here. They have camps where they train kids to shoot, become skinheads and hate Russians, and fight for Ukraine.
That doesn't mean they should be invaded,but they are no angels at all.
Source?
NBC.