Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.

So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This past summer, didn’t the DOJ put out a statement saying they had thoroughly reviewed the files and they contained nothing that would warrant any prosecutions?

Yes DOJ did that in July. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline

How did those incompetent boobs miss all the evidence incriminating Bill Clinton and Larry Summers?!? Fire them all!! Antifa, the whole lot of them!

Show us the evidence. The 20K emails are public. Post here.

https://people.com/epstein-s-brother-heard-from-a-pretty-good-source-that-the-epstein-files-are-being-scrubbed-of-republican-names-11851691

Epstein Brother Alleges Trump and Bondi Conspiring to Destroy Federal Evidence and Defraud Voters to Protect Trump and Other Accused MAGA Pedophiles

Anonymous wrote:Now that Trump is seemingly ok with it I just don't trust that what is to be released is all of the original 'files'.

Too many people are glossing over this. He was adamant about not releasing them and now he's "okay" with it. I've never expected the Epstein Files to have anything as damning as people seem to think (at least not as it relates to high profile individuals) but you can be damn sure that if something in there was incriminating for Trump or his political buddies, the files would have been scrubbed by now.

Anonymous wrote:Passes the senate by unanimous consent....on to trump.

Wow - NYT just now: "The process for a bill to be transmitted from the House to the Senate typically takes a few hours and is overseen by the House clerk. Now that the Senate has agreed to automatically advance the bill to the president's desk, it is possible that President Trump will have the opportunity to sign it into law this evening."

Passes the senate by unanimous consent....on to trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

Heck, just watch the female reporter being told “Quiet, piggy” by Trump the other day, after she brought up the Epstein files.

I read the transcript that was posted from Substack, and my first thought was how much it sounded like the way he spoke to Katie Johnson throughout her testimony.

Absolutely. Everything we know about Trump and his character today is exactly the same as Katie Johnson” account in 2016.

Her recruiter “Tiffany” corroborated her back then:

https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/

If these two women were to have the best lawyers and the best security today that would absolutely be the end of Trump. But everyone seems to be afraid…

He really has worse than I realized.

Which says a lot because I already thought that he has done more than anyone before him.

I have no doubt that it is her case that Epstein was talking about when he said “I know how dirty Donald is” and “I can bring him down” and NOT the Rybolovlev real estate deals… And the whole “oh, just get an abortion” to a terrified 13 yo - PURE EVIL, even Epstein was not capable of that…

Wanna bet that the only names that will be seen in these ‘files’ are those of Democrats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So why did Mike Johnson sit on this for so long if it was a near-unanimous vote?

He was working on the cover up.

He was buying time (with our tax dollars) so Pam Bondi could create versions of the files that could be released without implicating Trump.

This is my concern too. How will we know we are actually getting the real files and all do them?

Anonymous wrote:All the files incriminating Trump are in the process of being destroyed. Trump has already said he will pardon his people doing the work.

Do you know this (what source) or is it your assumption??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.

So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This past summer, didn’t the DOJ put out a statement saying they had thoroughly reviewed the files and they contained nothing that would warrant any prosecutions?

Yes DOJ did that in July. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline

How did those incompetent boobs miss all the evidence incriminating Bill Clinton and Larry Summers?!? Fire them all!! Antifa, the whole lot of them!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

Heck, just watch the female reporter being told “Quiet, piggy” by Trump the other day, after she brought up the Epstein files.

I read the transcript that was posted from Substack, and my first thought was how much it sounded like the way he spoke to Katie Johnson throughout her testimony.

Absolutely. Everything we know about Trump and his character today is exactly the same as Katie Johnson” account in 2016.

Her recruiter “Tiffany” corroborated her back then:

https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/

If these two women were to have the best lawyers and the best security today that would absolutely be the end of Trump. But everyone seems to be afraid…

He really has worse than I realized.

Which says a lot because I already thought that he has done more than anyone before him.

Anonymous wrote:Will this get bogged down and buried in the Senate?

Mike Johnson went on TV and pulled an MTG. He said that he is opposed to the bill he and the House just voted for almost unanimously, and that he expects Thune and the Senate to modify it (to protect Trump and Republcans) before passing it.

They are just playing hot potato.

No one is fooled by the Guardians of Pedophiles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So why did Mike Johnson sit on this for so long if it was a near-unanimous vote?

He was working on the cover up.

He was buying time (with our tax dollars) so Pam Bondi could create versions of the files that could be released without implicating Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:





Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.




So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This is what's going to happen. Massie said he feared this last night.

I hate to speak in cliches but the Epstein Files are a run away train and there is no way to stop its trajectory. trum ordered Bondi to investigate Clinton and trump can tell her to stop and release the files.

But, ironically, since he only told her to investigate Democrats…there is no reason to redact any information about Republicans—including Trump.

But, since they follow no rules that apply to the rest of us, I am sure the files have been “sanitized” by now. We need an independent prosecutor or judge to actually vet anything that is withheld.

Yeah, they had all that time the government was closed to come up with a strategy and cover up. However, there is zero chance Clinton will go down without pulling Trump down with him, and I'm sure Trump knows this. I hope it's a runaway train, but nothing has stuck thus far. The media didn't bother to tell us the felon raped a 13 year old.

Are all democrats morons, or is there a high oversampling on DCUM?

Anonymous wrote:It will pass the senate as soon as today. It will be "DOJ investigations" that stall it, but that will only inflame the MAGAs and everyone else, more.

This excuse won't fly because Trump can tell Blondi-Bondi to stop the investigation of Clinton and release the files.