Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They chased him and trapped him illegally. He was chased for blocks. They had multiple cars that eventually blocked his way out. He couldn’t go the other way because a truck blocked him.
They hunted him, called him a ni**er and murdered him.
They never followed the other 15 people that are on camera walking through the house.
They were racists that killed because of race.
Did the other people keep coming back over and over? Did they run out of the house when spotted?
He could have told them what he was doing, and waited for the cops. However, he was on probation and knew he'd get in trouble for the trespassing. Probably jail time since he was on probation, and likely why he did what he did.
Why did he have to tell three random people who he was and what he as doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They committed multiple felonies while “trying to ask him” about something they didn’t see that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They chased him and trapped him illegally. He was chased for blocks. They had multiple cars that eventually blocked his way out. He couldn’t go the other way because a truck blocked him.
They hunted him, called him a ni**er and murdered him.
They never followed the other 15 people that are on camera walking through the house.
They were racists that killed because of race.
Did the other people keep coming back over and over? Did they run out of the house when spotted?
He could have told them what he was doing, and waited for the cops. However, he was on probation and knew he'd get in trouble for the trespassing. Probably jail time since he was on probation, and likely why he did what he did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They chased him and trapped him illegally. He was chased for blocks. They had multiple cars that eventually blocked his way out. He couldn’t go the other way because a truck blocked him.
They hunted him, called him a ni**er and murdered him.
They never followed the other 15 people that are on camera walking through the house.
They were racists that killed because of race.
Did the other people keep coming back over and over? Did they run out of the house when spotted?
He could have told them what he was doing, and waited for the cops. However, he was on probation and knew he'd get in trouble for the trespassing. Probably jail time since he was on probation, and likely why he did what he did.
Why did he have to tell three random people who he was and what he as doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They chased him and trapped him illegally. He was chased for blocks. They had multiple cars that eventually blocked his way out. He couldn’t go the other way because a truck blocked him.
They hunted him, called him a ni**er and murdered him.
They never followed the other 15 people that are on camera walking through the house.
They were racists that killed because of race.
Did the other people keep coming back over and over? Did they run out of the house when spotted?
He could have told them what he was doing, and waited for the cops. However, he was on probation and knew he'd get in trouble for the trespassing. Probably jail time since he was on probation, and likely why he did what he did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Why did they need a shotgun to ask him a question?
They made the mistake of taking the gun, and pursuing him. Why there will be a conviction, but the fact is he made a bad choice as well.
No he didn’t he was trying to get away from crazy racist with guns.
I’m a woman and there is no way men are allowed to “detain” me without that being a threat to my self.
All made bad choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Why did they need a shotgun to ask him a question?
They made the mistake of taking the gun, and pursuing him. Why there will be a conviction, but the fact is he made a bad choice as well.
No he didn’t he was trying to get away from crazy racist with guns.
I’m a woman and there is no way men are allowed to “detain” me without that being a threat to my self.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
They chased him and trapped him illegally. He was chased for blocks. They had multiple cars that eventually blocked his way out. He couldn’t go the other way because a truck blocked him.
They hunted him, called him a ni**er and murdered him.
They never followed the other 15 people that are on camera walking through the house.
They were racists that killed because of race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Why did they need a shotgun to ask him a question?
They made the mistake of taking the gun, and pursuing him. Why there will be a conviction, but the fact is he made a bad choice as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Why did they need a shotgun to ask him a question?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gave an effective closing. (Didn’t see the rebuttal.)
Defense lawyer for shooter completely reframed the events and did a good job for his client. Right up till he asked the jurors to reach a hand to pull his client out of trouble.
Defense lawyer for father was as described in PP’s.
Defense lawyer for driver of second truck tried reinterpreting/reframing evidence and shifting blame to other shooters. Multiple long, deep sighs as if he was boring even himself.
The decedent was no angel and may have been up to mischief. But chasing him down and blasting him when he tried to escape wasn’t the right thing to do.
Best guess is a conviction, although the father’s direct involvement seemed fairly minimal and the judge did give lesser included instructions for the second driver.
lol
The decedent ran across the front of the truck to punch and get control of the gun. He wasn't shot trying to escape, nor was it ever their intent to shoot him. They tried to ask him why he was in the neighbors house when he attacked.