Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, people wil be at risk of coughing or a slight fever or being uncomfortable for a few days. Those older people over age 70 with serious pre-existing conditions will be at a very large risk.

You clearly know of no one who has actually had it. I have. It isn't what you describe. Yes, some are asymptmatic, but for those who have it but aren't hospitalized, it is a brutal, brutal illness.

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, people wil be at risk of coughing or a slight fever or being uncomfortable for a few days. Those older people over age 70 with serious pre-existing conditions will be at a very large risk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

yup I quoted that same article 2 or more is 18.7 % which I round to 20% it's towards the bottom

and if you look at the NYT it's people with at least 2 who are getting hit

again these people are already unhealthy makes sense

Close to half the US population is at increased risk of complications. Fine, that doesn't bother you. It bothers most people. You can minimize it all you want, it won't stop bothering most people.

maybe this will cause more people to actually care about their health

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

yup I quoted that same article 2 or more is 18.7 % which I round to 20% it's towards the bottom

and if you look at the NYT it's people with at least 2 who are getting hit

again these people are already unhealthy makes sense

Close to half the US population is at increased risk of complications. Fine, that doesn't bother you. It bothers most people. You can minimize it all you want, it won't stop bothering most people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

yup I quoted that same article 2 or more is 18.7 % which I round to 20% it's towards the bottom

and if you look at the NYT it's people with at least 2 who are getting hit

again these people are already unhealthy makes sense

Close to half the US population is at increased risk of complications. Fine, that doesn't bother you. It bothers most people. You can minimize it all you want, it won't stop bothering most people.

maybe this will cause more people to actually care about their health

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

yup I quoted that same article 2 or more is 18.7 % which I round to 20% it's towards the bottom

and if you look at the NYT it's people with at least 2 who are getting hit

again these people are already unhealthy makes sense

Close to half the US population is at increased risk of complications. Fine, that doesn't bother you. It bothers most people. You can minimize it all you want, it won't stop bothering most people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

yup I quoted that same article 2 or more is 18.7 % which I round to 20% it's towards the bottom

and if you look at the NYT it's people with at least 2 who are getting hit

again these people are already unhealthy makes sense

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Here's a study:

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0679_article

"We estimated that 45.4% of US adults, with a wide range across age groups and states, might be at increased risks for complications from COVID-19 because of existing chronic conditions."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

once again seems like all of you are hell bent on finding the exceptions to the rule

we all saw the data in the NYT and less than 6% of the hospitalizations were otherwise healthy prior. And again that's not 6% of the population. 80% of healthy adults 1 or less chronic conditions has extremely minimal risk of major complications period end of story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

This is false. Most of the deaths are of people who some additional conditions, but there are many who have dropped dead from coronavirus related strokes, and others who have suffered permanent lung damage. We really don't know enough about this for one to make blanket statements like this.

Anonymous wrote:So it seems like the White House installed the 14 day guidelines with the goal of being able to "open up" around May 1st, and when the numbers coming back didn't support that, they figured that it was fine to ignore the guidelines. Well...I guess its a wrap!

The death spigot will be turned off in a few weeks, woo hoo!

/s

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:for a disease that barely impacts 20% of the population

move on with your lives people

Barely impacts the population when the country is locked down. You just don't want to admit that we responded appropriately, do you?

I dont think 80% of the country should be held hostage for something that only hits people with multiple unhealthy conditions

those 20% should stay home and let the rest of us function normally